Friday, June 08, 2007

Eight year old charged with lewd sexual conduct

So this eight year old boy has a babysitter, who sexually assaults him, and its blamed on him by the local friendly anti-male prosecutor. Isn't that so wonderful? The pussy pass works in all situations, as long as a male is involved, the card-carrying member of the Royal Sex will go free. Think about all other cases like this where it doesn't even make it to the police, let alone to prosecution. Think about all the cases where the boy is told that its his own fault. Society is only able to accept the concept of sexual abuse against children when it is committed by a man - whether it is to a boy child or a girl child.

It has to be a boy.

A mother is upset after a 14-year-old babysitter engaged in sexual conduct with her eight-year-old boy, and the eight-year-old was charged with lewd conduct.
Prosecutors have since dropped the charges against the boy, but his mother is still concerned.
The sexual conduct occurred during a game of “truth or dare” while the boy was being watched by the babysitter.
Prosecutors say that, while the babysitter initiated the contact, the young boy was a willing participant.
“She dared my son to touch her breasts,” says Michelle Grosbeck, the boy’s mother.
After hiring the teenager to baby sit, Grosbeck got the feeling something was wrong.
“It was just that sense that something wasn’t quite right with this 14-year-old girl,” she said. She asked her son what had happened. “He just came right out as if nothing was awry, and just started talking about what had happened.”
Grosbeck went to police and child protection workers, and the case went to the district attorney, after which her son, age eight, had been charged with an act of lewdness with a minor.
Grosbeck says the Salt Lake County District Attorney told her both the child and teenager were equal participants. But Mrs. Grosbeck didn’t believe that.
“My son is eight, he’s a little boy. He does not have the ability to participate on the same level as a fourteen-year-old,” she said.
Although the charges against her son were dropped, she is concerned that the same thing could happen to other victims of sexual abuse.
“I don’t want parents to be afraid to go to the state agencies that are supposed to be protecting our children when things like this happen, out of fear that their children are going to be charged
The district attorney’s office confirmed the charges had been made, and that they had been dropped. Other than that, they wouldn’t comment. The Division of Child and Family Services also declined to comment.

Look at how the story starts - the mother is upset! God forbid, the child and the abuse he suffered is secondary to the tale. Exactly like how a 1950's story about a pet slave nigger kept by a white woman and how she is offended by something that happened to her pet would read. This is nothing against the mother of course, I'm pointing out the misandry in the media.

Look at the man-hating prosecutors - they themselves have the gall to say that, "Oh, he is a male, he must have been a willing participant, hell let's get him for daring to touch her - he should have clearly known better, eight is a very mature age." HEY ASSHOLE, DON'T GIRLS MATURE FASTER THAN BOYS, OR IS THAT ONLY WHEN IT SUITS YOUR FUCKING AGENDA??

And how the fuck do these assholes get to decline commenting about these atrocities? Who the fuck is holding these man-haters accountable? The media certainly isn't up to the task.


  1. I guess we better start teaching boys the ABC's of SEX sooner than later.

    Repeat after me, "I did not have sex with that woman."


  2. Let me guess. Both the boy and the babysitter are the children of single mothers. Not once in the story did we ever hear anything about the childrens' fathers, did we?

    Nevertheless, the boy's mother should get a lawyer and sue the crap out of the girl's family, AND the State of Utah, both for damages and to make them pay for all the therapy the kid's going to need.

    ...too bad some mangina judge is going to rule that because he's a boy, he liked it, and therefore won't need therapy.

  3. What is all the fuss about?

    He just put his hands on her breasts.

    Really there is no reason to condem the girl too much.

    It is obvious though that the poor boy is persecuted by man-hating institutions.

    Thsis girl should marry, she is nubile obviously

    And guess what, every single country in the ENTIRE WORLD is going pro-women's rights. Even saudi arabia.

    Women win, we lose. I hope they win a nuclear holocaust.

    Could we swap links. I have an MRA weblog at . (If you do put a link
    to it please tell me in a comment on one of the articles so I know).

  5. Boys that age and younger now routinely receive punishment for "sexual harassment", so this type of case was the logical next step. (We've all heard the story of the six-year-old who was suspended for kissing a classmate.) But now, with news stories of young children being handcuffed and even shocked with Tasers by cops, stories such as the one Pete highlights here shouldn't surprise anyone.

    Look at the date: it isn't even a new story! It first appeared on 28 July 2005—almost two years ago.

  6. Another older news item where a 4 year old boy was suspended for sexual harassment when he hugged a teacher.

    Waco boy, 4, suspended for 'sexual' hug

    Atleast they didn't tag him as a sexual offender.


    Another reason why zero tolerance/political correctness is ridiculous.

    Already boys are not allowed to play with toy-guns, slingshots, or even play tag and soccer. Boys have been suspended for pointing their fingers (and chicken fingers from the cafeteria) at each other while playing 'cop-and-robbers.'