The last post was about how to know if you're a player... now, this was actually a find-stupid-and-replace-with-hilarity counterpart to an article actually written by a feminazi, one we bloggers may be familiar with. I won't give her name or link here, but the list was actually called the Rapist Checklist.
With a name like that, you can imagine the vitriol it must contain, and the sad sad person who would have written something this deluded and stupid. Anyway, this is how feminists are, and this kind of utter bullshit is what we're fighting against. The feminazi army is not worried about little things like facts and the truth, emotions is their game and they play it well, thanks to that whole "humans evolved to protect women" thing.
The Rapist Checklist
1. You are a rapist if you get a girl drunk and have sex with her.
2. You are a rapist if you find a drunk girl and have sex with her.
3. You are a rapist if you get yourself drunk and have sex with her. Your drunkeness is no excuse.
4. If you are BOTH drunk you may still be a rapist.
5. If she's alternating between puking her guts out and passing out in the bed then you're a rapist.
6. If she's sleeping and you have sex with her you're a rapist.
7. If she's unconscious and you have sex with her then you're a rapist.
8. If she's taking sleeping pills and doesn’t wake up when you have sex with her then you’re a rapist.
9. If she is incapacitated in any way and unable to say 'Yes' then you're a rapist.
10. If you drug her then you're a rapist.
11. If you find a drugged girl and have sex with her then you're a rapist.
12. If you don't bother to ask her permission and she says neither 'Yes' or 'No' then you could be a rapist.
13. You are a rapist if you 'nag' her for sex. Because you manage to ply an eventual 'yes' from a weary victim doesn't mean it's not rape. You are a rapist.
14. You are a rapist if you try to circumvent her "No" by talking her into it. She's not playing hard to get, and, even if she IS it's not YOUR responsibility to 'get' her. You're still a rapist.
15. You are a rapist if you manipulate her into sex when she doesn't otherwise want it. If you say, "If you loved me you’d do X" then you're a rapist. If you say, "All the other kids are doing it!" then you're a rapist.
16. If you threaten her, or act in a way that SHE thinks you're threatening her then you're a rapist. If you puff up and get loud and frustrated while trying to 'talk' her into sex then you're a rapist.
17. You are a rapist if you don't immediately get your hands off of her when she says 'no'. You are a rapist if you take your hands off of her and then put them back ON her after 10 minutes and she eventually 'gives in' to this tactic.
18. You are a rapist if you won't let her sleep peacefully without waking her every 15 minutes asking her for sex. Sleep depravation is a form of torture and YOU are a rapist.
19. If you're necking with her and you're naked and you've already gone down on her and she says 'No' to sex with you and you have sex with her anyway then you're a rapist.
20. If you're engaged in intercourse and she says 'No' at ANY point and you don't immediately stop then you're a rapist.
21. If she said "Yes" to sex with a condom and that condom breaks and you proceed anyway then you're a rapist.
22. If she picked you up at a bar looking for sex and then decides that she doesn't WANT sex and you continue then you're a rapist.
23. If she changes her mind at ANY point for ANY reason and you don't immediately back off or you try to talk her into it and get sex anyway then you're a rapist.
24. If you don't hit her and she says 'No' you're still a rapist.
25. If you don't have a knife or a gun or a garrote and she says 'No' then you're still a rapist.
26. If you're a friend of hers you can still be a rapist.
27. If you had sex with her the night before but she doesn't want morning sex and you pressure her for it anyway then you're a rapist.
28. If you're her husband you can still be a rapist.
29. If it's your wedding night and she doesn't WANT to have sex with you and you force or coerce her anyway then you're a rapist.
30. If she's had sex with you hundreds of times before but doesn't want to on the 101st time then you're a rapist.
31. If you penetrate her anally, orally or digitally against her will then YOU my friend, are ALSO a rapist.
32. Women do not owe you sex.
33. Buying her dinner does not entitle you to sex.
34. Paying her mortgage does not entitle you to sex.
35. Buying her clothing does not entitle you to sex.
36. Buying her lingerie does not entitle you to sex. It also doesn't mean that she has any obligation to wear that lingerie around you.
37. Spending any amount of money on her does not, ever, entitle you to sex.
38. Seeing her legs or cleavage does not entitle you to sex.
39. If she 'turns you on' you're not entitled to sex.
40. If she has fucked every man in a 10 square mile radius and she doesn't want to fuck you and you have sex with her anyway, then you're a rapist.
41. Her clothing is not a reason for you to rape her. Her LACK of clothing is no reason to rape her. If she's wearing a thong and pasties you STILL have no right to rape her.
42. If she's a prostitute and she says "No" then you're a rapist.
43. If she's a stripper and she says "No" then you're a rapist. Likewise, if she's a stripper and she's been rubbing against your dick all night long and you follow her to her car and have sex with her against her will then you are ALSO a rapist.
44. If you watch a woman being raped without calling the authorities then you're as bad as a rapist and you may also be a rapist yourself.
45. If you don't fight rape then you accept rape.
46. If you don't believe a woman when she says she was raped then you're encouraging rape.
47. If you choose to remain friends with a man who raped a woman you are encouraging rape.
48. If you confess to the authorities that you raped a woman it does not exonerate you. You are not suddenly a model of good behavior.
49. If you ‘only’ raped one woman, you’re STILL a rapist.
50. You cannot tell who is a rapist by the way they look. Rapists are your friends, your brothers, your fathers and you won't know it.
51. Do not get frustrated with a woman if she doesn't trust you. SHE already knows that rapists don't wear signs on their foreheads. Something you think is innocuous SHE may find terrifying.
Sickening shit. Looks like feminism hasn't progressed far beyond "All sex is rape" yet.
Thanks to VT for the .gif, and LB for the "You may be a player if..." list. You guys rock.
Yes, this is very pathetic.
ReplyDeleteThis is why men must start being downright firm when dealing with nutcase feminists and mangina judges and politicians by letting them know that the backlash is coming and MEN will restore sanity to this situation - and when that day comes it WILL be JUSTICE to incarcerate you for hate-crimes and crimes against humanity.
Lately, I have begun including the jail-time notion for those perpetrating supremacist hate-crimes against men whenever I write and complain to politicians.
And I don't give a shit. These fucking retards should, and will, go to prison for the lives they destroyed with their pandering to a hateful ideology. And truly, tell me it is not justice to send some fucking douchebag who willfully utilizes propaganda to pass laws which unjustly and permanently destroy men's lives.
This fucking pigs should be given a window to look at the bleak outlook of their "not worth a bucket of piss" futures.
It will not be justice for men who have spent a dozen or years in prison on a trumped up, ridiculous rape charge, UNLESS those responsible spend time being punished.
52. If you're a rapist you might as well buff the bishop.
ReplyDeleteHey Pete- Did you catch wind of the Spousal Rape bill being proposed in Calif.? Imagine that, your wife could just say you raped her after you just got done lovemaking or fucking, and she calls police tells them that she was raped, you go to jail, you lose everything just because she said you raped her. Wives can be very vidictive, especially to have you instantly tossed in jail and instantly have custody and instantly have the checking account. What a concept man.
Anyway, nice piece Pete.
LMFAO! Pete, I just looked at the picture and it just dawned on me who it was, ROFL!
ReplyDeleteThis stuff really is quite sick, men MUST take action and quickly.
ReplyDeleteJay
Forevermale.blogspot.com
BN, it is usually best to assume the worst when dealing with ANY law or case relating to a woman vs a man. Whether its in rape, child custody, assault or petty theft or pretty much anything else, you have to assume going in that you're gonna be raped for no reason other than the fact that you're a man.
ReplyDeleteThe marriage strike isn't growing for no reason.
Jay, I love your blog and have it in my favorites. Keep on truckin my good man.
ReplyDeletegood blog mate.
ReplyDeleteLol! I actually though this was a ironic listing written to make fun of feminists, I just jumped in and started reading. Someone has obvious issues with fantasizing about sex and rape all the time.
ReplyDeleteThat would be all the feminists.
google for Will Hethrington, still in prison after 20 years because the lesbian fiends say he can't get out until he admits he did it, and he said from day one his wife offered him sex, in retrospect for the purposes of sending him away.
ReplyDeleteI would not want to be that ex-wife fiend or the judge in the case if he ever gets out.
Yes, those feminists always make complete shrill sense!
ReplyDeleteUsually I know that feminists have higher IQ's than all um, doormats, but hey, thier brilliance shines through!!!
31. If you penetrate her anally, orally or digitally against her will then YOU my friend, are ALSO a player. (congrats)
ReplyDeleteIf you say "congrats" to someone who has committed the very definition of rape, then congrats, you are either terminally clueless or psychotic. Also, you are clearly sexist against men as per your take on #20, because men have just as much right to say no during sex without being stigmatized for it.
Defining 'rapist' as person who has had sex with someone against that person's will:
You are a rapist if someone is too drunk to consent. You are a rapist if you're the one penetrating while the other person's just lying there and they're too drunk to consent. Sleep/unconsciousness is not consent, though prior arrangement in the context of an ongoing relationship is obviously an exception. Unable to say yes--ie. to give consent--is rape (exception time, unless they're mute and able to sign yes instead). Too drugged to consent is rape. Yes after extensive nagging and duress is not true consent. Consent to previous sexual activity does not entitle one to future sexual activity. Consent to one form of sexual activity does not entitle one to different sexual activities. No means no at the point at which it's said. Unsolicited gifts do not entitle you to sex. Solicited gifts do not entitle you sex, though they may entitle a refund of the gifts. Wearing something you consider inappropriate does not entitle you to sex. Calling those who claim they were raped liars (whatever happened to innocent 'till proven guilty?) makes rapists think they can get away with it. Remaining friends with a rapist would generally imply you approved of their behaviour. Strippers can be raped. Prostitutes can be raped. Since we women are told that we shouldn't dress too skanky/drink in bars/walk around at night because some of you men are rapists, can you blame us for not instantly trusting all men?
If you're the sort of nice guy who'd prefer not to place their orgasm over the risk of raping someone, you really shouldn't have a problem with any of the list items. You wouldn't want to claim that rape is sex, right?
-Sarah.
Thanks, Sarah, for making my point in an item I wrote a while back, explaining why all American women (and women in nations under American influence) are clinically insane. (dontgetmarried.com)
ReplyDeleteYou are not only clinically insane. Your insane view of rape belittles the real crime of rape when it exists. Also, if you weren't insane, you could understand that rape laws are intended to harshly punish those who harm good women, not to find as many reasons to throw men in prison as you can think of.
Frankly, while we realize you aren't sane enough to understand it, 'rape' of a prostitute is not especially a serious act. There should be some sort of offense, such as there is for a parking meter violation, but to toss another man in prison for years for that offense is totally and stark-raving insane, too. If her body and her sexuality means nothing to her except a few bucks, it shouldn't mean much of anything to anyone else, either.
Your hatred for men makes you clinically insane, and you think there is something horribly wrong with anyone who is not as insane as you are.
Rape does happen, and when it does, the rapist should be horribly punished. Your attempt to make rape an almost universal experience, like most things man-haters do, makes things worse for women, not better.
For five thousand years, civilization has known that a few men rape, and a few women file false rape charges. Study after study shows that over 50% of rape charges are outright lies. Yet, you fiends are so insane you truly believe no women ever lies about rape.
Recently, there have been some well pubicized cases where women have filed false rape charges. the most famous in recent months is the sick case at Duke. In other cases, women have been arrested and jailed for making false charges of rape. People like you who support false rape charges belong in jail with them, though I like the Muslim approach to fiends like you much better.
Anonymous age 64.
rape laws are intended to harshly punish those who harm good women...'rape' of a prostitute is not especially a serious act.
ReplyDeleteSo I assume it's okay to steal from someone who's been deceived by Internet fraud and gives a lot to charity (because they clearly don't regard their money very highly), it's okay to murder someone into extreme sports (because they obviously don't care that much for their life), and the severity of crimes in general should be regarded by the judicial system depending on the character of the victim?
Of course, some circumstances--ex. X throws the first punch, Y hit back with a broken glass bottle and killed X, A slept with B's partner and boasted about it leading to B making a homicidal attack--are taken into account in a provocation defence. But seeing a prostitute should not make a sane man inclined to penetrate them against their will.
Also, if you've donated blood before but you don't feel like going down to the clinic this week, is it okay if I drag you there by force and strap you to the table? Or can I take part of your liver, because you seem to be making quite free with your regenerating body parts?
Also, if a man goes around shirtless a real lot and has lots of sex with lots of women for free, am I (cast me as the repulsive hairy femhag whom said man wouldn't want to be seen dead with) allowed to tie him down and mount him? Because his body clearly doesn't mean anything at all to him.
You are a very disgusting man.
ReplyDeleteIt's obvious that what you're trying to do, here, is make each point on your list seem like an absurd reason to call someone a rapist, but there is not a single one listed here that I wouldn't call rape.
Let's keep this simple: sex is a gift. The other person must give it to you freely; you cannot take it without consent. If the person is too drunk, drugged, or otherwise incapacitated to give it to you, that doesn't mean it's okay to take it, because IT'S NOT YOURS. You have to wait until they are able and willing to give it to you.
If you give a person gifts, it would be nice if they gave you something in return, yes -- but it's ALWAYS their choice whether or not they choose to reciprocate, and then, what they choose to give you. Giving someone a gift does not mean you are entitled to demand anything you want in return.
Just because someone has given you things (sex) in the past does not mean they are entitled to continue doing so in the future. I can understand why you would be upset if they decided to stop, but it does NOT give you the right to steal from them. Sex is theirs to distribute or withhold as they please. Also, because someone gives you a gift, that does not mean that you are entitled to demand more or different gifts from them and take these if they refuse. So if someone consents to certain sexual practices with you, this does not mean they are required to give you whatever you want.
These rules apply to everyone, including prostitutes and strippers. Prostitutes may give you sex in exchange for money, but they STILL have to give it to you. If you take it without their consent, you are a rapist.
One last thing: the picture at the top of this entry is truly disgusting and disturbs me on a deep level.
Non consensual sex is rape, no matter how you look at it!
ReplyDeleteAll women are whores, no matter how you look at it!
ReplyDeleteNo matter what form of payment they take...
No matter how much they value their slit, its always for sale for the right price.
All women are whores, no matter how you look at it!
ReplyDeleteSo... what exactly is the fundamental difference in character between you calling all women whores and a woman calling all men rapists?
Why is woman-hating a more noble pasttime than man-hating?
I'm just trying to see how you justify your hatred and superiority when you're basically doing the same thing you accuse your "feminazis" of doing, except you're being a "masculinazi".
If you're really better than these women you portray, don't act like them.
Do you feminazis have a genuine problem with understanding parody?
ReplyDeleteAnd the difference is that... man-hating is generally accepted and no one chastises a woman when she says shit like, "lol men are dogs" but they are quick to jump to women's defense when someone says something that's either the truth, but a bitter pill to swallow, or plain misogynistic. (which is rarer than you think, oh wait you're a feminist you don't think.)
Like I said earlier, you can take a feminist's comment and turn it 180° to get to the truth. Let's do that here.
"Why is woman-hating a more noble pasttime than man-hating?"
Truth:
"I feel that 'man-hating' is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them." -- Robin Morgan, Ms. Magazine Editor.
Men are dogs if you think that anything you listed is true, dogs only care about eating sleeping and sexual intercourse and the continuation of all three. if you only care about the three things i listed its kind of hard to consider you more than a human dog
ReplyDeletebtw if this list you made is "parody" whats it paroding?
all those things listed are considered by most people to be rape.
if you consider all women whores than there is good reason, they consider all men dogs
i think its amazing how narrow your world view is pete, do you know nothing about history of the human race at all?
women have been oppressed for hmm the last six thousand years by men, up until the 1th century ad, you might as well call them chattel, bought and sold by men
they had no control over thier own lives, even worse than the other races owned by whites
man-hating is considered more noble only because women havn't had rights for most of human existance, but equality is better than eather male or female dominence!
The beauty of Goetian's 'mother-knows-best' lecture is you can boomerang it back so easily by changing a few words:
ReplyDeleteKeep in mind that 'man' also includes daddy government and 'you' refers to a woman.
Let's keep this simple: MONEY is a gift. The other person (MAN) must give it to you freely; you cannot take it without consent. If the person (MAN) is too tired, exhausted, or otherwise incapacitated to give it to you, that doesn't mean it's okay to take it, because IT'S NOT YOURS. You have to wait until they are able and willing to give it to you.
If you (WOMAN) give a person gifts (MONEY), it would be nice if they gave you something in return, yes -- but it's ALWAYS their choice whether or not they choose to reciprocate, and then, what they choose to give you. Giving someone a gift does not mean you are entitled to demand anything you want in return.
Just because someone has given you things (MONEY) in the past does not mean they are entitled to continue doing so in the future. I can understand why you would be upset if they decided to stop, but it does NOT give you the right to steal from them. MONEY is theirs to distribute or withhold as they please. Also, because someone gives you a gift, that does not mean that you are entitled to demand more or different gifts from them and take these if they refuse. So if someone consents to certain FISCAL practices with you, this does not mean they are required to give you whatever you want.
These rules apply to everyone, including men soliciting prostitutes and strippers. Men soliciting Prostitutes may give you MONEY in exchange for SEX, but they STILL have to give it to you. If you take it without their consent, you (WOMAN) are a rapist.
How does it feel when the shoe's on the other foot, Goetian?
Quite nice, actually. I wouldn't disagree with anything you said.
ReplyDeleteA woman shouldn't have the right to steal, any more than a man should have the right to rape. And if she's nagging him for money, well, that's called being a bitch.
So men that nag for sex are called?
ReplyDeleteMental Rapists, of course!
ReplyDeleteWhat are you even trying to say, here? I've already said that nagging for sex is wrong, and shown that I don't have a double standard about it when women nag for money, so I don't see your point.
ReplyDeleteNagging for sex isn't rape; it only becomes rape when you physically violate the person. But it's still a really low thing to do.
@ goetian,
ReplyDeleteYou know, this whole list might just be true.
But what I understand when I read this is list, is that this feminist is saying to whatever man she's with, "I have the pussy, so I make the rules. You have zero say in our sexual relationship, it's all about ME ME ME ME ME ME ME! And right now, the rule says that I'll have sex with you the next time Cthulu wakes up, or the day 'Duke Nukem Forever' goes gold." In other words: never.
A man may think he's entittled to certain things, but clearly, she thinks she's entittled to dictate the terms of their sexual relationship, or is it actually a dictatorship? Seems like it to me.
Sex happens to be very important to most men, and depriving him of it on a whim is grounds for kicking her to the curb! If a woman tried to institute something like this towards me in my life, I would without hesitation pack my bags and LEAVE HER, love or no love. Let her find some other excuse for a man to dominate.
I don't believe anybody ever said you had to stick with a woman who won't sleep with you. If you want to leave someone for not putting out, fine. That's your decision, and it's a hell of a lot better than rape. Saying, "Don't have sex with her if she doesn't want to" is not the same as saying, "You must stay with her even if she decides she doesn't want to have sex anymore."
ReplyDelete@Shanleigh
ReplyDeleteBut she deserves child support and spousal support does she?
Addendum,
ReplyDeleteAnd she has the audacity to complain that there are no good men left in the world? She has the gall to bitch
and moan that her biological clock is ticking?
@Canadian Liberal
ReplyDeleteI fail to see how saying that forced sex is unacceptable in a relationship is "dictating". No. She is asking that the man respect her right to do as as she pleases with her body. Likewise, he deserves the same treatment. She should not be able to pressure him in this way, sexually or fiscally, either.
If you think that forced sex is appropriate in a relationship, let me ask this: how would you feel if she demanded sex/money from you and took it forcefully if you refused? You wouldn't like it, would you? That is what you are advocating doing to them.
If the idea that rape should be acceptable is just a reaction to how you feel women take advantage of men, then wouldn't a better reaction simply be to break up with these women, rather than return violence with violence? That solves nothing.
@ goetian
ReplyDeleteI didn't say forced sex or rape was acceptable.
I said that acting like a stuck up bitch was personally unacceptable to me. And I refuse to be blamed, or made to feel guilty about the actions of others. I'm responsible for myself, nobody else.
Your post - "If the idea that rape should be acceptable is just a reaction to how you feel women take advantage of men, then wouldn't a better reaction simply be to break up with these women, rather than return violence with violence?"
My post - "Sex happens to be very important to most men, and depriving him of it on a whim is grounds for kicking her to the curb! If a woman tried to institute something like this towards me in my life, I would without hesitation pack my bags and LEAVE HER, love or no love. Let her find some other excuse for a man to dominate."
I guess if I'm leaving her, that's the same as raping her right?
Addendum,
ReplyDeleteI will not tolerate attempting to accuse me, or any other person of condoning forceful sex. I have a post on my blog about the Duke rape case, maybe you should read that before you decide what I'm for and against.
But I will tell you flat out, it's not forcefull sex I'm against, I'm deeply against this misandrist, hateful check-list. It is despicable that feminists would attempt to resort to these shame tactics to try to force me to see their point of view. This list is an attempt to subvert my personal autonomy by trying to tell me how to think and feel. It also is a deliberate attempt to make me feel like a rapist, and to sour heterosexual relationships. It is also an attempt to subvert a woman's autonomy, by not advising her what might be rape-TELLING HER that she's been raped. Why can't feminists let a woman decide for herself, if and when she's been raped?
Goetian,
ReplyDeleteIf she nags him for money, that is psychological RAPE because, in many cases, it happens chronically over years. Further, it is not criminalized nor can it be. However, sexual coercion within marriage is criminalized. Double standard, no?
Contrary to what you believe, upon entering marriage, women do give up the right to dictate when men get sex while men similarly, give up the right to pick and choose when they share their money/security. If they don't do this, there is really no point in getting married. This being said, men should not abuse their newly gotten right and neither should women. If such abuse is proven to occur BEYOND REASONABLE DOUBT or if false allegations are made, divorce proceedings should occur, with marital assets going to the non-offending party. At no point, however, should either women be criminalized for nagging for money or men for coercing wives into sex.
The reason you (and many misguided women and men) feel so strongly about rape is probably because you have been taught that it is about 'domination' and not sex. Rape is really about sex. I recommend you read 'Against our will' by Brownmiller (loony radical feminist) and then read 'A Natural History of Rape' by Thornhill and Palmer to see exactly how little sense the feminist arguments make in light of evolution and common sense, for that matter.
Your argument of mutual independence for both man and woman amounts to a void marriage: if men can only get sex on a woman's terms, it is actually better, safer AND CHEAPER to use a prostitute/friends with benefits etc. This is why prostitution in some countries becomes legitimized. Similarly, if women can only get money from men on a man's terms, you can reasonably expect that many women will be unhappy.
Further, almost all the so called 'marital rape' cases are 'he said, SHE SAID' situations, where courts side with women. Any 'he said she said' circumstantial case, in the absence of incontrovertible evidence, should never go to trial.
@ davout
ReplyDelete"Contrary to what you believe, upon entering marriage, women do give up the right to dictate when men get sex"
Well said brother! Makes you wonder why feminists are so strongly against prostitution doesn't it? Must have something to do with wanting the right to dictate sexual relationships. Since you can't have a autocratic relationship, when an alternative, more honest business relationship exists, prostitution becomes the enemy because a prostitute's prices are normally much lower than your average feminist.
And thus, feminism ruins more and more couple's chances at happiness by claiming license to hate men all they want.
The Shady Lady Ranch in Nevada
offers $100.00 for your basic 20 minute intercourse. That translates into $300.00 per hour.
From what I understand, this can be considerably cheaper than a wife under some circumstances. Especially if there's the chance she'll screw you over in family court. Therefore, I think men are going to begin giving feminists an ultimatum; stay the hell away from our relationships, or we're going make prostitutes very wealthy.
Wow, them chicks are HOT in the Shady Lady Ranch! WooWee, if I would of know I could have save a bundle on that real big expendature after and during the dicvorce w/kids! Sound like a commercial huh Pete?
ReplyDeleteI think 'goetian' nailed it right in that person's comment from 4:13pm January 12, 2007 in response to the comment above by 'davout' in defining the equivalent female behavior to what is outlined in the rapist checklist as 'being a bitch'
ReplyDeleteThat is accidentally brilliant and is the perfect idea to not only achieve equality of the sexes but also expose the utter hypocrisy of the current system.
I therefore move, in the interest of equality that all Western Nations must immediately write and enact laws that treat women in and punish women in exactly the same fashion men are punished for being rapists.
In other words, if a man so much as whispers to anyone that a woman is "a bitch" she is immediately arrested, stripped of all human rights, put on a the newly enacted Bitch registry and face life imprisonment for even the weakest of accusations. The courts must by default side with any male who accuses a woman of being a bitch in the interest of protecting all males and children from the horrific acts that are carried out by bitches.
I move that the term bitch when referring to a human female remain as loosely defined as it currently is in the modern vernacular. Therefore ANY act that ANY male perceives as ANY female being a bitch automatically becomes that standard enforced by law with all of the appropriate extreme punishments and presumption of guilt that come with it.
I also move that when the point is reached that as many women are rotting in prison cells as males that then and only then should it even be considered that we allow as many females to occupy positions on boards of directors or other highly sought after and lucrative positions as men currently hold. Though I am all for a clause that includes as many female casualties of war as male casualties and as many females occupying the least desirable highest risk jobs as males before the lucrative and desirable male jobs are opened to 50% female occupancy.
But a life passable sentence for being a bitch and lifetime registry on the bitch registry for all those who get out of prison would sure be a good start towards equality under the law if feminists insist that current sexual assault laws are valid.
You're a bitch, off to prison with you!
This Rapist checklist is absolutely ludicrous, the most moronic thing i have ever encounter.
ReplyDeleteI shall say to those stupid feminists to STOP ASSUMING that they are speaking for every single women.
Of course i also disagree with men calling every single women a whore, because even though i may agree that every single FEMINIST MAY BE A WHORE, NOT every single women is a whore, only feminists. ( they have problems with long term relationships, gee even short term, yes i am talking out of my ass and ?)
I am a 25 year old married woman, have been married to my husband for 3 years and 1/2 and been with him since the age of 17. I have never been with any other guy. He was my first and last. Does that make me a prostitute ? Hell, I certainly do not think so. but anyway this is not what i am interested in right now. the message is that those stupid feminists need to realize they can't speak up for every single women. they are a bunch of loosers and hypocrite bitches always backstabbing their best friends in the back at any moment, or anyone else for that matter. They are the kind of women you can't trust with your back at them.
Feminists, your list is bullshit, it is just a way for you to to be the "Boss", especially since you have no potential to assert your authority in a constructive way, in an appropriate way. The onli thing you can do is whine ( ?) complain all day.
Guys, your average ridiculous feminist is the ( remember your high school years) the most bitchy , hypocrite and unfortunately most popular girl (s) in school!sleeping around, ditching boyfriend for boyfriend, and bullying everyone else not fitting her/their standards of holly bitch.
Of course, there may be exceptions to these rules, but in general they are true, just try to remember these type of girls from your youth... and hey nothing has changed, things are even getting worse.... if you're a male teacher and send a girl to get dressed she is going to be like " oh, you've been looking jerk haven't you?"
See what i mean?
Men want to be safe? avoid becoming teachers! ( sidetracked here)
And this is shame on the parents especially stupid feminists mothers and stupid feminist Hollywood culture giving the example and teaching girls these innacceptable behaviors!
If I ever have sons i'll definitively be teaching them to stay away form this type of girl.
Anyway coming back to subject, you feminists need to understand that your rules are stupid and that some of us women, enjoy having sex any time with our husbands and sometimes up to ten times a day, so you you know what? fuck your list up your ass. and something else?
when i have a romantic time with my husband and it leads to intercourse, there is nothing more frustrating than being asked " you want to have sex ?" shut the hell up, there is nothing more disturbing and mood breaking than being asked such a stupid thing!!!! sexual intercourse is normal among normal couples without needing to ask permission. And THAT does not make our husbands RAPERS.
So if you disagree you have some serious brain damage, go get it checked once and for all! go get some help, you obviously have nothing else to do than putting your nose in people's private lives, get a life yourself, seek help! Female, 25
Incidentally, my wife posted some female responses to the rapist checklist. Read them here.
ReplyDeletePitiful. I'll agree that some of those are insane, but Jesus, you think it's okay to have sex with a passed out girl? What the hell is the matter with you?
ReplyDeleteFuck off, Anon.
ReplyDeleteI thought this blog talks about The Ultimate Man’s Sex CheckList. I already have my ideal man. all i need is list...
ReplyDeleteThis is from encyclopediadramatica.com
ReplyDeleteIT'S A JOKE.
Alright, I'm just not going to report it if any of these things happen to me. I'm sorry.
ReplyDeleteYou didn't even post the whole list. So by "I won't give her name or link here", you meant: "I don't want any of you seeing the facts". I've got to give you credit mate, it was a very clever clover-up.
ReplyDelete