Sunday, December 03, 2006

Hazardous Material



I don't remember where I got this graphic from, but I like it!
Posted at

6 comments:

  1. AnonymousDecember 03, 2006 7:50 PM

    I read this week a woman who died had at one time weighed around 1100 pounds, and had lost nearly 700 pounds at one time. So, that weight thing should probably be maximum 500 kg...

    That reminds me of a cartoon I saw yesterday on a MRA blog. It showed two extremely obese AW, wondering why men were interested in 'those' Thai women. In the background were two slim and sexy chicks bearing signs which said BORN TO SERVE.

    Heh, heh.

    Anonymous age 64

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousDecember 04, 2006 2:04 PM

    Here's a thought pattern of a feminist named NYMOM, then you'll see my response as a young father(me).


    NYMOM said, "Those federal incentives to states are not the CAUSE of mens' negligence, it's the RESULTS of it..."

    Oh that's comforting. Now I have to pay for my dad's actions or his dad's dad's actions?

    I don't think so. Times are going to change real soon. The laws are stacked against fathers because of the men who did horrible things to their families in the 70's and early 80's and unfortunately fathers like myself are paying for it.

    However NYMOM, it can be changed, and it soon will be. Women will soon notice that there are better fathers out there than there was 20 years ago, the courts are already noticing, it's out there and it's growing.

    God would not have given me the ability to dream, without the possibility of making it come true. And I did it!

    The gravvy train is coming to a halt soon. They'll be feminists like you flipping out because the train has stopped, being the conductor is the Family Courts of America.

    I will not, and I am not, going to continue to pay for my fathers, or my grandfathers mistakes they did years ago, and neither will my son or his son.

    There's a new generation of men and women here now, and some more on the way, they are the one's that grew up fatherless, and they are pissed.

    You can ramble all you want NYMOM, you soon will be part of an elite and tired group, it's called feminism.

    BN

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousDecember 04, 2006 4:00 PM

    BN, you remind me of a call I got while working with divorced fathers. From 1984 till 1993, I supplied no-fee counseling services to an estimated 1600+ men in that time period. (Numbers a result of statistical sampling by my daughter.)

    One night, a guy called me for advice and information on divorce. After spending an hour or so of my time with him, he said, "You know, this is your fault!"

    I said, "Tell me more."

    He said, "I don't know what you did, but it's men like you that causes the courts to treat men like me this way."

    I let the imbecile rant on. It turns out he committed adultery, but only a little bit, doncha' know. And, he hit his wife, but only a little bit, doncha' know. So, he assumed he, an adulterer and wife beater, would have earned custody of his kids if it weren't for brutes like me.

    So, what are the horrible things I did? There weren't any. I did not commit adultery; I did not beat my wife. In fact, I was the injured party. The feminists had not yet invented the term emotional abuse, but that was what my first wife did, with her incessant screams and curses in every waking moment.

    Because my caller was not real smart, he imagined that to be a militant father's rights activist, I must have been a real brute. Yet, if I had been, over the 15 years I wrote op-eds for the local newspaper, that fact would have been front-page news, wouldn't it?

    I HAVE SHOCKING NEWS FOR YOU. I CERTAINLY DON'T KNOW ABOUT YOUR PERSONAL FATHERS AND GRANDFATHERS BEHAVIOR. MAYBE YOU ARE DESCENDED FROM A BUNCH OF VIOLENT CHILD ABUSING AND ADULTERERS AND WIFE BEATERS, BUT THERE WAS NO REAL PROBLEM WITH BAD FATHERS IN THE 70'S AND 80'S. THIS IS ALL IN YOUR MIND, AS MY STATUS AS A BRUTE WAS IN THE MIND OF MY UNINTELLIGENT DETRACTOR. (Um, I wonder if you are his son?)

    NYMOM has been outed right here on PP's blog. Her identity is known, and she is an admitted advocate of single mom's for all children. She is also an extreme man-hater. If you see her picture, you will understand why. She has said on another blog that she has not had sex with a man in over 20 years, and I believe it.

    Let me make myself clear, BN, because I doubt one telling -- or twenty -- is enough for you. I was a dad in the 70's and 80's and neither I nor many other men were the sort of brutes you believe in.

    Then, as now, most child abuse was done by the mother. JAMA in 1984 printed a study which showed that admission to a large city hospital for domestic violence injuries was equal for men and women. Most divorces were caused, then as now, by adulterous women. Then, as now, man-haters like NYMOM were spewing their lies and hoaxes about the evil male brutes.

    And, then, as now, there were plenty of manginas who believed that all men but themselves were vile, violent brutes.

    You have a long way to go before you can even claim the right to shine the shoes of the father's of the 70's and 80's.

    ReplyDelete
  4. BloggerNogginDecember 04, 2006 4:28 PM

    Sorry mate if you took offense, none intended. From what I've seen there's allot of men that left their wives and never paid a dime in support back then. The men left according to the feminists and fathers were never accountable. Slowly that changed. It has changed drastically and has crossed the line of accountablity into steaking our rights to our children. I know not every father was like that anon. The feminists jumped on the men that bailed out on their children and wives long ago and all I was clearing up was that (I felt) that she was telling me basically that we as fathers and men created the mess we are in and that's that. I won't be held accountable for SOME men's actions back then. That's all. Again, sorry if you were offended or felt like you had to defend yourself. It wasn't intentional.

    BN

    ReplyDelete
  5. Pete PatriarchDecember 05, 2006 12:18 AM

    Calm down everyone, we're all on the same side here. :-)

    Well, except for the trolls.

    ReplyDelete
  6. AnonymousDecember 06, 2006 6:33 PM

    I respect what you are trying to do here, Pete. However, no, we are not on the same side. A commenter blamed the fathers of my generation for the problems men face today. That is slander at best, and I have no idea why I would not be offended.

    I worked at some degree as a man's rights activist from 1978 till 1993, and as a counselor of divorced fathers from 1984 till 1993. At every point, there was a man with his nose against mine telling me how bad women had it, and how terrible all men BUT HIMSELF were. That wife=beating adulterer who said I was PERSONALLY responsible for his problems was little different than this commenter.

    By the way, anyone who suspects he might be right, needs to pull his head out of the sand, and listen to the feminist lobby groups today. They are claiming MUCH HIGHER non=payment rates then they claimed back in the 70's and 80's. They are also claiming MUCH HIGHER domestic violence rates then they claimed back in the 70's and 80's. Omigod, you guys today are beasts -- at least anyone stupid enough to believe the lies they are telling about you guys today would think so.

    It's all lies, just as it was back in those days. But, you can be sure in another ten or twenty years, some pipsqueak will be blaming you guys in the 90's and 00's for his problems.

    It is men who break up Men's Rights organizations, not feminists. If it weren't fot these men who think they are the only good man in town and that all men but themselves are evil, there would be no feminist control of our society.

    All of this nonsense by men with no clue what has happened nor what is happening, is the reason there has been no organization of men at all, and there never will be. The only solution is for men to strike one at a time against marriage. Either women will stop and listen, or in worst case, more men will evade their evil clutches, and there will be fewer kids f****d up by divorce.





    anonymous age 64

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)