Never marry

The Side Effects of Love

Your wife will beat you, she will control you, the world will laugh at your emasculated status, and if you raise a finger or your voice, the world will punish you as one.

Positively hilarious! I can't think of a better idea for a movie (or its cover)! Rented this movie today, haven't watched it yet so I don't know whether I'm accurate in judging the book by its cover, but I can guarantee that there has not been a single non-agenda movie that has a woman with a black eye on the cover and the man smiling, as if to say, "Wait till we get home, there's more where that came from!"

Drunken sluts all over campus? Men's fault of course

We all know that women can get really really drunk - they don't have to worry about being beaten up by some other drunk guy, they know that they'll have a posse of friends, both male and female, to protect them from harm if they do get drunk, and anyone who teabags them will suffer the consequences.

College girls can drink like guys, but with more consequences

I'm not even going to go into why there was a study that specifically studied females and not male college students. Repeat after the feminists: Boys can never ever come to harm as a result of alcohol, period.

But apparently, fragile little strong independent womyn suffer the consequences of drinking as much or more than men, like "missing class, having unprotected sex, and undergoing changes in personality" - isn't that last one something that is pretty much a foregone conclusion at college, hell, in that age range anyway?

According to researchers, they also drink for different reasons. While men drink "out of competitiveness," says Loyola University psychology professor and study co-author Joseph LaBrie, women drink out of social pressure from male students. "A woman who plays drinking games and puts down many drinks is held in high esteem by males," says Eric R. Pedersen, another co-author of the study.

Of course, the fact that a man who can drink you under the table is held in high regard by all is left out. What else is the competitiveness about? There has to be some point to competition, and that is to be the last to fall in a drinking game.

A woman who drinks a lot is held in high regard because she's likely to be a heavy partier and more likely to sleep with you, and if you hold her in high regard other girls are going to want to emulate her and become sluttier. Its an awesome situation for a guy to be in. I bet a girl's football team member isn't welcomed at any party, no matter how many drinks she could put down.

The study analyzed the drinking habits of 105 college students — 35 males and 70 females, averaging 18.84 years in age — over a three-month period of time, monitoring every drinking event attended and quantity of alcohol consumed.

Contrary to what previous studies have claimed, the results revealed a higher drinking rate in women than in men. Sixty-four percent of the study's female students and 57 percent of the male students participated in at least one drinking game over the course of the three months. (Might be because just having a hot body can get you into a roaring party whereas you have to have a lot to offer to get into a party that's trying its hardest to have more girls than guys) Female students participated in a total of 915 drinking events, 187 of which involved drinking games, and male students participated in a total of 469 drinking events, 84 of which involved drinking games.

Researchers speculate that men and women have different motivations for engaging in drinking games. "Men do it out of competitiveness, to get the other person drunk," said study co-author, Loyola Marymount University psychology professor and Heads Up! Program Director Joseph LaBrie. "Women drink for social reasons because they want to enhance, find or build relationships."

Again with the "men do it for wrong, women do it for right" bullshit. Men do it to hurt other people, and females do it to build relationships and shit. Oh fuck off you goddamn biased researchers. This is either pure conjecture or they're listening to the shit these girls spewed forth, and we all know how likely females are to tell the truth.

However, researchers dispute the effectiveness of women playing drinking games as a means of winning respect or positive attention from men. "Women, in general, are not getting their needs met by doing what they're doing," LaBrie said.

She also thought, "I'm intelligent and these dumb blondes aren't, these bimbos are obviously dumber than a box of bricks and I'm the one who can tell them what they want and how to get their needs met. Now where did I keep that 'Become lesbian NOW propaganda...'"

Anyway, go to webshots or photobucket or facebook and search for "beirut" or "beer pong" or something. You'll find images of college girls in various stages of undress, many bending over and pushing their boobs together to distract the guys on the other side of the table with their cleavage, some flashing their tits, all in the name of winning. And these communists are saying that women don't have any power, only men are competitive, and that these sluts do it in thrall of the Patriarchy and whatnot. What absolute bullshit.

Suze Orman in Oprah Magazine

I was reading through a copy of the Oprah magazine someone left at the local laundry, and as I was browsing through it, in between the old fat naked ugly women (two instances – one in a Dove ad and one in another ad) and Dr. Phil, one name struck my eye… Suze Orman. Apparently she has a column in that rag, and I’ve heard her name before, spoken with reverence and an acknowledgment that she’s a good money advisor. I think she’s on TV too.

In any case, the first letter was a real eye opener – it was about this woman who wants to get married to her boyfriend, but can’t stand the thought that his money may not be in her clutches. So she writes to Oprah magazine about it. I’m typing it all up here, so do read it all.

Dear Suze, I am living with a man who’s worth more than a million dollars. When we started dating, I jokingly told him that if we ever got married and didn’t work out, all I wanted was a plane ticket home. Well, now we’re talking about a prenuptial agreement, and he keeps bringing up that comment. His son wants everything written down so that if his father dies or we get divorced, my children and I wouldn’t get a cent. My kids are grown up, but I need to be able to support myself – as far as money goes, I’ve got nothing to bring to the table. My boyfriend said that I could live in his home, and his son would dole out cash as I need it. What should I do?

Just look at the whore. She starts off with the biggest reason for her involvement with this man, i.e. his net worth, and dismisses the comment that probably warmed the boyfriend’s heart and made him think she’s not a gold-digger – dismisses it as a bloody joke. Now of course she is at wits’ end, thinking that she should be able to sink her claws into his estate with impunity and is shocked that he isn’t letting her. She is bringing nothing to the marriage except the promise of sex, and wants everything in return. Hell, the independent liberated woman she is, she’ll probably call the cops for marital rape if he puts the moves on her when she isn’t in the mood (read: she is thinking about how its his bank account not theirs/hers.)

Suze’s reply:
This situation is no joke. With your boyfriend hiding behind your tongue-in-cheek comment for protection, I’m not sure this relationship is going to fly. What kind of man would want his wife to answer to his son for money? If your boyfriend continues to put his son’s desires ahead of yours, you need to seriously consider whether he’s the right man for you. Make it clear that you respect his right to leave everything he accumulated before marrying you to his son, but acknowledge in the prenup that assets and debts accrued during marriage would be split evenly.

I also want you and your lawyer (no mention of the would-be hubby?) to discuss setting up a life estate on the house. [Blah blah blah…]

Now if your husband balks at any of this, I think you should run. When a person can’t share his financial life, I question his ability to share his heart. The way we handle money is a manifestation of who we are inside, and how he approaches the topic signifies his love and respect for you. Without those two ingredients, you shouldn’t be considering a walk down the aisle.

Its very interesting – she also dismisses the comment as tongue-in-cheek, when the woman saw fit to include it in so many words in a one-paragraph letter to her. If the comment was that irrelevant, she wouldn’t have included it in the letter, right? The second sentence begins with the shaming language [What kind of man… not a real man that’s who] and I lost my respect for her advice at that point.

Suze also says that the prenup should allow for him leaving everything he has accumulated so far, but then says that anything accumulated during the marriage would be open season – i.e. he keeps earning, she keeps on doing whatever she was doing to have a $0 net worth until now, and surely the Nordstrom’s credit card debt will go to him and the house to her.

Her last paragraph was also cruel – she doesn’t say anything about this whore who isn’t bringing anything to the table in terms of finances and what this says about her personality and who she is, but jumps on the boyfriend for not carelessly entering into a game where the table is stacked against him in every fashion.I also did a google search on her, and found this on wikipedia…

Orman told The New York Times magazine in February 2007 that she is lesbian. Her partner of seven years is Kathy Travis, a coproducer on The Suze Orman Show. Orman has bemoaned the fact that she could not marry her partner and gain the corresponding tax advantages.

Housework reduces risk of breast cancer? Must be patriarchal oppression!

I saw this article on one of Engadget's sister blogs and decided to check it out.



Housework reduces risk of breast cancer - That's Fit



Apparently, women who do housework are less likely to develop tit cancer.

A new study of more than 200,000 women suggests that doing household chores like dusting, mopping and vacuuming was significantly more cancer protective than playing sports, or having a physical job.

The article ends with the simpering apologist comment, "This isn't to say that there's something inherently cancer protective about the act of mopping itself, but rather that moderate physical activity, like housework, may be more effective in reducing a woman's risk of breast cancer than more rigorous, but less frequent exercise."



The comments on the article were hilarious and depressing at the same time.

The very first comment: Ok, what man conducted this study??



Sorry to say, but this doesn't make any sense. I personally know of women who have been housewives for years and they still got breast cancer. Please readers, don't get swayed by this one study. (This "health chick" is talking as if the article is telling you to drink your own pee or something. What is so bloody offensive about doing a little housework anyway? Women these days are dirty and filthy - they dress up and smell nice to bag a rich guy and because their entire sense of self-worth is based on how many glances they can get from the men around them, they're slobs when no one is looking. And she was so incensed by the idea of doing a little housework that she posted the same comment twice)



STUPID STUPID STUPID!!!!!! (This is the entire comment)



Maybe the article about housework/breast cancer link was written by a man - probably one whose wife does not keep a clean house

and he wants to motivate her. Not funny buddy!!! (No, you dumb broad, only feminists do biased studies with already decided outcomes. Men would be fired if they did that. Women would just sue the company for "not taking the emotional female-centric view, discriminating against the female way of thinking" or something equally ridiculous)



I've heard it all now. I can't see anyone taking this article seriously. How stupid do you think women are? (Really really fucking stupid)



This is such a CROCK! Then how do men get breast cancer? By not doing enough housework??? I'm a very active person and I still got breast cancer. It's these kind of articles that need to be shredded BEFORE they ever make it to print! (Ah, the old standby - CENSOR CENSOR CENSOR!!! Men don't have breasts honey, I don't know what kind of confused you are, but men rarely get breast cancer. You're a bad woman, that's why you got breast cancer)



Right on Jan--had to have been conducted by men. By the way, most men DON"T do housework and precious few men ever get

breast cancer. So what gives??? (Most men don't sit on their ass all day watching Oprah and eating bonbons, waiting for the hubby darling to come home to the "Honey Do (not counted as Housework) list" either)



Does that mean that if men started to do clean the house, there would be a reduction in prostate cancer too?? (No, that means if MEN held marches and collections for prostate cancer, fewer men would die of it. If men earmarked some of that breast cancer money for their own gender, fewer men would die of it. But you're a heartless bitch who only gives a fuck about her own gender, so men suffer)



If that's the truth, why aren't men keeling over from breast cancer? (MEN DON'T HAVE TITS YOU IDIOT)

It continues, there's a shitload of "LOL this study was conducted by a man" (most studies are conducted by men you cunts, women are too stupid to do studies that aren't biased and have an outcome defined - ie feminist studies) and loads of anecdotes of the "Oh I knew this virgin and she died of AIDS so I should fuck as many men as I can while hubby pays the bills and child support" variety.

An interesting post

I saw this post today, and I was like, finally, a discussion where it isn't all about the women and the injustices they must suffer daily, rapists around every corner, body snatchers from Mars ready with their anal probes, sexual harassment in the workplace, one could think that EVERYTHING is out to get the poor average woman.

There are still many inequalities that exist in North America between men and women. Many say that they are "subtle" but really, they are glaring you straight in the face. Most don't notice because it is so ingrained into our society that they don't even think about it. It's also important to note that it isn't just disadvantageous to women. (Awesome start)



For example, take two children who are growing up in the same household. One is female, one is male. The male child is emotional, plays with dolls, and has tea parties. The female child likes to get dirty, is aggressive, and plays with monster trucks and other toys that are meant for boys. You'll find parental comments about the boy to be very concerned. Some might begin to wonder whether or not he is homosexual. They would most likely encourage him to play with more masculine toys, and to, well, start acting more like a boy. Comments toward the girl, on the other hand, would most likely be around the lines of a parent saying affectionately "Oh, isn't she such a tomboy?" And there would be little concern. (The poster really did an awesome job till this point. If he/she had ended this post right here, I'd have posted a kudos or something because its so fucking rare to have someone actually defend men, even if they don't get to the stage where they can blame women without the chivalry instinct kicking in. But read on...) This is probably because many see it as weak to have a feminine disposition, and the fact that she was displaying masculine traits would be more appealing. (Oh now you've gone and blown it. What in the fuck are you talking about, ya crazy ho?)



The question is, why is it more respectable to be masculine? Why are men called "pussies" or "sissies" or "girls" when they are being weak, or when they fail? Why is it that to be feminine is to be weak, dependent, and submissive? Why is it that when men show traits of femininity it is frowned upon, but in most cases when women show traits of masculinity it is encouraged? (Now would be a perfect time to say that society does not allow men to be weak but it allows girls to be strong and weak at the same time, in the blink of an eye a girl can change from strong independent boss to weak little girl in need of protection)



Just the idea that to be feminine is to be weak is something that is still a huge hinderance to equality between the sexes. Today, it is not so much the laws that we make, but the way that we think, that has an effect on equality. (Hoo boy. This was the nicest build up I've ever seen to a display of typically feminist trash)



People might say "Well women cry more than men, and that makes them more emotional and more vulnerable" but the question a person has to ask is "Well, what if society conditions them to be this way?" (Not, what if society conditions men to be stoic and crying is said to be a sign of weakness for men? Not, why does society expect men to never display any emotions?)



The thing is, gender equality is something that many in our society take for granted. I think that it is important to continue to ask questions, and to be aware that freedom and equality aren't things that have just automatically come to us. It is something that we have had to work for, and if we don't pay attention and keep asking questions, then all of the progress that we've made could be taken from us.



Also:

fem·i·nism /ˈfɛməˌnɪzəm/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled

Pronunciation[fem-uh-niz-uhm] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation

–noun



1. the doctrine advocating social, political, and all other rights of women equal to those of men.

2. (sometimes initial capital letter) an organized movement for the attainment of such rights for women.



^

Who in their right mind would say that they aren't a feminist? All negative connotations aside. (Especially when the alternative is to be called a misogynist)

I must say, by getting into the dictionary, feminists have their trump card right there - any debate where feminism is questioned, the evil man-haters just point to the goddamn dictionary definition and say, "So there."

Protecting the sluts

On an unrelated note to the story about the 13 year old pregnant female, I was looking at rape law in Italy, I happened across this:

18. Any person inducing a pregnancy termination without the consent of the woman shall be liable to from four to eight years' imprisonment. Consent extracted by violence or threats or under false pretences shall be deemed not to have been granted.

The same penalty shall be applicable to any person who brings about a pregnancy termination by actions designed to injure the woman.

This penalty shall be reduced by one-half if the injuries result in the hastening of childbirth.

If the woman dies as a result of the acts referred to in the first and second paragraphs, the penalty shall be from eight to 16 years' imprisonment; where very grave personal injury is the result, the penalty shall be from six to 12 years' imprisonment; where grave personal injury is the result, the latter penalty shall be reduced.

The penalties laid down under the preceding paragraphs shall be increased if the woman is under 18 years of age.

So if you lie to your girlfriend and get her to get an abortion, it is not ok. So not ok, in fact, that they'll put you in jail for it, because in the law's words, she did not give consent. I won't speak about the violence/threats bit, but I think its clear which sex has the monopoly on cajoling, threatening and acceptable violence in society.

Compare this to the rights men have - how much truth and how many lies can we expect from our women.
If she lies about using birth control, that's A-OK.
If she lies about not being able to get pregnant, that's A-OK.
If she lies about whose baby it is, that's A-OK.
If she's a fatty and lies about not being pregnant, that's A-OK.
If she lies about getting an abortion and then has the baby anyway, that's A-OK.

The man can do jack-fucking-shit if the woman lies to him at any stage in the relationship, whether she's pregnant or not, whether he's the father or not.

And if you lie to her to have her get an abortion, basically putting your own two cents in, in a situation where its all about her, you will be put into prison. Wonderful. What sense of equality? What sense of balance and fairness?

Oh, and I simply love the double standard used in pregnant woman murder cases - its a life if she deems it so, its a useless parasitic bit of tissue if she deems it so, but if anyone causes it harm, its murder.

Judge doesn't force 13 year old slut to get an abortion

I saw this news article being dicussed today - Judge sentences girl to abort baby.

Now leaving aside the fact that it is a 13 year old we're talking about, one who is in no way even close to being an adult and is not capable of making her own decisions, the headline just screams "Men commit injustice on poor girl!!" The news article is actually completely wrong, but we'll get to that later.

Moving on to the story:

An Italian judge ordered a 13 year old girl from Torino to abort her unborn child because her parents were opposed to the baby.

Italian legislation states that a minor is not allowed to decide whether to abort or not and the 'decision' falls entirely on the guardians or parents.

The shocking story was brought into light by Italian newspaper La Stampa in which the paper reports that the girl didn't want to abort the baby but had to after the ruling. She then had to receive treatment after telling her parents she was going to attempt a suicide.

The girl got pregnant by her 15 year old boyfriend but despite this she still wanted to keep the baby.

However her parents were very angry and demanded an abortion. After the abortion the girl went into a frenzy and threatened she was going to kill herself.

"The unborn baby is still a life and I defend life whatever the situation." Severino Poletto, Archbishop of Torino told the paper.

"Society must take of this child. I certainly oppose abortions but this case allows us to reflect on the situation. We have to take a step back and ask ourselves how this could have happened to a 13 year old girl." added.

Now, Italian law, like the law in most western countries, permits teens to abort - if they don't get permission from their parents, heck even if they are simply afraid of their parents' reactions and don't want to own up to them, they can go to a judge who is forced to approve it after a cursory visit by a state provided psychologist.

So this story is completely bunk, but what's interesting are the comments where I read it - people were horrified a girl could be forced to do anything, let alone be forced to get an abortion when she wanted to birth the baby (at 13 years old - and let's not forget that a childbirth is more risky than an abortion for a healthy adult female). Waving the banner of PRO CHOICE and A WOMAN'S RIGHT and all that, people were incensed.

Also take a look at the last line, the one I bolded - "how this could have happened to a 13 year old slut" - this archfucker is in a real big hurry to shift the blame from the skank to anyone else, nooo she must be a fucking paragon of virtuosity, being a bloody knocked up bitch at the ripe old age of 13. I like how everyone is willing to blame the boyfriend, the parents, anyone except her.

Now, I think that a girl who got herself knocked up even before the age of consent isn't the brightest monkey in the zoo - if her parents are her legal guardians, they should be able to make this decision for her, since the 13 year old has life to live - like it or not, our culture doesn't let women in their most-fertile years make babies because of taboos. She will see her friends living it up, and she wouldn't be able to. Not the best way to raise a child. So I was surprised but happy to see the judge sticking up for the parents, since they would be the ones bearing the cost for a long time.

The real story comes to light in another newspaper, and it turns out that the girl actually wanted the abortion and so did her mum, and they both were afraid of their Dad so they went to the judge to get permission to abort. Of course, this slut used up tons of liras and there's no stopping her - she has apparently been a regular customer of the social services and psychologists and of course, she's a child and a girl, so they pretty much worship her.

Interview with her mom:

Valentina has improved. She is still recovering in the Queen Margherita Neuropsychiatric unit, but is slowly buying back her peace.

Reported by our newspaper and confirmed to the press by medical professionals from the Children's Hospital, the forced abortion story has gradually assumed differing outlines. Parts of this controversy will be revealed to you. Now is the time for the mother to definitively address this sad and difficult story.

"Even though Valentina was always sure that it was the right thing to do," the mother says, "obviously she was more fragile than the typical 13 year old." Not to mention skankier.

How did Valentina react when she found out she was pregnant? "Understandably she was worried. 'I'm scared, mother, I'm a day late' she said to me. When the pregnancy test came back positive, she showed me. 'I can't keep it, mother.' I soothed her by saying 'we will find someone to help us.' Then we went to get advice from Sant' Anna on the right procedure in these cases. They told us that we need to see a doctor." And that they would need the participation of a judge.

"Valentina was terrified to say anything to her father, so the guardianship judge intervened to authorize my daughter's independent decision. The judge summoned us, then spoke for a long time with Valentina about her options should she decide to keep the child. My daughter had no doubts, and the judge gave approval, as provided by law. Beyond that, my daughter has been seen, before and after, by state psychologists at the hospital."

Was that support what you expected? "Yes, always. Social services and psychologists have really taken my daughter's case to heart. She had already had a difficult past, with issues of adolescence and adoption. Problems that were exacerbated after the abortion. But not because she was remorseful or went crazy. She has not responded well to the stress and pain. We decided, and the state services agreed, that she needed admittance to the neuropsychiatric unit of Queen Margherita."

It turns out, however, that before the pregnancy was terminated, Valentina wound up in the care of the Mauriziano (rehab?) after using alcohol and drugs. "Completely unrelated, my daughter was drugged by someone in a dance club. [Yeah, whatever] I was informed the hospital had the capacity to deal with this. The abortion had been scheduled in the near future, two weeks later, but after this crisis my daughter asked us to do it early. The schedules allowed it, and that's what happened."

Aside from Valentina's condition, what is the worst thing at the moment? "I get angry because I do not understand the fact that someone has insinuated that my daughter was forced to have an abortion."

The news circulated insistently in the hospital. "I just want to know which doctor has said such things. Even if now it doesn't really matter."
On the health of Valentina: "Because she can quickly get better, it is necessary that, about her and the controversy, we have silence. From everybody."

Interview with the Family Court:

"Allow me to state that no woman, under-age or of majority, can be forced to abort." Marina Ponzetto, president of the "Family Section" of the civil court of Turin, whose one of ten magistrates, Giuseppe Cocilovo, was the guardianship judge who authorized Valentina to abort at 13 years old, does not hide her worry: "To sow the seed of doubt that an abortion has been forced is to create enormous damage. Every girl must know that she will find someone [in the court] that will
listen and that can help. That's what we're there for, to aid and help girls and punish men," she added with a grimace showing teeth bloodstained from the corpse of the last man to pass through the court.

Has Judge Ponzetto read the provision regarding the case of Valentina? "Yes, and I have found it adequate and justified, perfectly tailored to what is permitted by law. From our point of view, taking into account the dramatics surrounding the case, it was a normal measure, totally in keeping with other decisions made in difficult cases regarding under-age autonomy. Because of this, at first, it was difficult for me to figure out what all the controversy was about."

What does the law require when the demand to abort arises, as has now happened, from a minor accompanied by only one of her parents? "The law considers abortion to be an exceptional measure, not to be used as simple birth control. The decision should not be hurried, and for adult women there is a waiting period of seven days in order to reflect upon their decision before undergoing the procedure. The minor must notify the parents -- notify, not seek permission from -- because father and mother can disagree in principle yet accompany the daughter in her difficult moment."

When and why do the judges intervene? "In the (fortunately rare) cases in which the young person does not want to reveal to the parents her decision, or when there is fighting with the parents, or when both parents have told her no but she still wants to proceed."

Is that the way you worked on this case? "There already was a report from a doctor and psychologist. We insist on having the latter, because we derive delicate cases and want to be certain that nobody has put pressures on the girl. They had talked with the girl alone, as well as with her mother."

What is said to girls like Valentina? "First of all, we listen. It is important for us to know the situation in which the pregnancy occurred, the feelings there. Then we explain all the possibilities: it can be carried to term in a protected environment until birth, the child can be born and given up for adoption, or they can be admitted to a shelter for mothers with children. At the end, if the will has not changed, the judge only authorizes to grant [the girl] autonomy in her decision."

Have you ever denied such authorization? "Sure, yes. And those cases are just as delicate. In 2003, right here in Turin, against an authorization that had not even been denied by the judge but only sent back in order to get more in-depth reports from social services, a tragedy occurred: the young fiance of a girl committed suicide. As you can easily understand, these are not decisions to be made with a light heart."

I'm still pissed that the slut was not lectured or something, let alone have an entire army of people just waiting to get the fetus sucked out of her like a tumor and nobody even once mentioned anything negative. Hell, if you go ask them right now, they'll be all praise for wonderful, brave soul who got pregnant at the ripe old age of 13.

Woman drives through wall

And not just through any wall - the outside wall of a parking garage - on the second floor!! Hahaha, this is awesome. Hilarious how she managed to jam on the gas so hard that she broke through the wall.



Jokes about female drivers are quite politically incorrect, but it has to be true that they are more likely to be scatterbrained... err multitasking while driving a car and are consequently less likely to have all their wits about them to concentrate on the task of keeping the car on the road.



Insurance is also such a big scam - if women were charged more for the same reasons that insurance companies claim they need to charge men more, there would be rallies, million soccer mom marches, a day to commemorate the first woman to challenge the insurance companies and win millions, et cetera ad nauseum. But because men are charged more, we're told to suck it up, that the insurance companies have very good reasons for charging us more. Here, again, the assumption of women = good, men = bad leaves its black mark. Its clear that even though men drive more miles, they have fewer accidents per mile, and they obviously get more tickets and all that as well.



Of course, feminists don't have a problem with generalizing based on sex when its females benefitting from the generalizations, no siree.



Woman exits parking garage through second floor wall

A 49-year-old woman, who was reverse parking in a multi-story car park, mixed up the gas and brake pedals and almost ran her car completely through the second floor garage wall.

... And here come the excuses, which you obviously expect when its a story about a woman in even a vaguely negative light...

Apparently the automatic gearbox was the villain according to the woman, who was thankfully unharmed but no doubt received the shock of her life.

Yes, I'm sure she received the shock of her life - it was a demon car, and it was a villanious gearbox, and she was just a poor innocent woman who got caught up by the demons.