Science proves what we already knew

Relationships make women less horny

A woman's sex drive begins to plummet once she is in a secure relationship, according to research.

Researchers from Germany found that four years into a relationship, less than half of 30-year-old women wanted regular sex.

Conversely, the team found a man's libido remained the same regardless of how long he had been in a relationship.

Writing in the journal Human Nature, the scientists said the differences resulted from how humans had evolved.

For men, a good reason their sexual motivation to remain constant would be to guard against being cuckolded by another male

The researchers from Hamburg-Eppendorf University Hospital interviewed 530 men and women about their relationships.

They found 60% of 30-year-old women wanted sex "often" at the beginning of a relationship, but within four years of the relationship this figure fell to under 50%, and after 20 years it dropped to about 20%.

In contrast, they found the proportion of men wanting regular sex remained at between 60-80%, regardless of how long they had been in a relationship.

Tenderness

The study also revealed tenderness was important for women in a relationship.

About 90% of women wanted tenderness, regardless of how long they had been in a relationship, but only 25% of men who had been in a relationship for 10 years said they were still seeking tenderness from their partner.

Dr Dietrich Klusmann, lead author of the study and a psychologist from Hamburg-Eppendorf University Hospital, believed the differences were down to human evolution.

He said: "For men, a good reason their sexual motivation to remain constant would be to guard against being cuckolded by another male."

But women, he said, have evolved to have a high sex drive when they are initially in a relationship in order to form a "pair bond" with their partner.

But, once this bond is sealed a woman's sexual appetite declines, he added.

He said animal behaviour studies suggest this could be because females may be diverting their sexual interest towards other men, in order to secure the best combinations of genetic material for their offspring.

Or, he said, this could be because limiting sex may boost their partner's interest in it.

Professor George Fieldman, an evolutionary psychologist from Buckinghamshire Chilterns University College, said: "These findings seem to fit in with anecdotal studies and his explanations seem plausible.

"The rational for why a woman's sex drive declines may be down to supply and demand. If something is in infinite supply, the perceived value would drop."

The study may have found something useful and pertinent, but look at the way they couch it. "Women want tenderness" my ass, its that men give women tenderness, while women give men nagging and scolding and generally are controlling.

That is why 90% of women expect tenderness, while 75% of men don't. But nooo, they couch it so that you think men are just brutes while women are fucking delicate flowers (who can obviously stand shoulder-to-shoulder with men in every arena while at the same time being fucking princesses that will wilt if they don't get pampered).

Don't marry guys - the sex will get less frequent, the sex you do get will be to the cunt who is growing older day by day, whose tits sag a little more with each passing year, and whose gash smells worse every birthday. Farrell put it best - marriage is the fulfillment of the woman's primary fantasy, while a man who tries to act out his own primary fantasy is said to be going through his mid-life crisis.

And here's a quote to finish it off:

I think it might be partially because a lot of men -but not all- seem to get rage-y if you give them any suggestions on their lovemaking routine. "Honey, would you mind doing x with y" can make a guy look like a kicked puppy. So women just don't make any suggestions -hell, sometimes they don't even make them in the first place, expecting sex to be perfect like a romance novel and not wanting to ruin the "magic"- and, oala: Boring, unsatisfying sex!

Blame the male baby!

An Omnipresent conspiracy for the Privileged Sex

http://hatemalepost.blogspot.com/2007/05/everett-herald-lies-about-gender-pay.html  

Back in 1992 the AAUW published the report, How Schools Shortchange Girls. The report purported to show that American schoolgirls were being kept down by the ever-present patriarchy. Man, they make those guys sound so powerful, I want to go to their meetings, and join up, but I just can't find them anywhere.

You know, the patriarchy does have a female counterpart. And you can go to their meetings. Does NOW and SOW ring a bell for anyone? It would be hilarious if it wasn't so infuriating how everyone has bought the lie of an omnipresent, omniscient Patriarchy and the feminist version, the Matriarchy, with all those taxpayer-funded organizations only concerned about the health, education and welfare of Women, has been built up under our noses.

The Matriarchy even has Action Alerts put out when there is some rumbling, like a Shared Parenting bill or anything else that would impede the wealth transfer from male to female. The Female Mafia will stop at nothing to ensure more privileges and rights for one sex, while putting the equivalent burdens on the other.

Great comment on Alimony

Saw this comment on NYC Buck's blog. Wonderful comment by a person I would love to have on my blog here.

Rob Case said...

There is absolutely no logic to the claim that married women have a right to their working husband's assets and income.

By luck rather than good management, I'm still a bachelor at 47, and have been retired now for 2 years. I own my own house and am financially secure. I came by my money just like most other guys - I held down a regular job. The difference is, as a bachelor, my earnings didn't get spent on dresses, shoes, jewellery, exotic vacations, hair-do's, ridiculous education, cute children's clothes, high-end furniture, extravagant housing and god knows how many other extravagances that bedevil the poor struggling married guy my age.

By the time I got to 45, I still had the cash a wife would have blown. I didn't have the debt she would have buried me under.

I know I'm not just one of a small percentage of guys who do ok unmarried. Look at the life of any married man in your street, and you will see the house he lives in is full of crap that he would never have bought for himself - stuff he would have left at the dump had he seen it going for nothing. He lives in, and pays for, a house and life-style whose primary purpose is to service the vanity of his wife. Most guys would be vastly better off without their marriage.

The notion that a woman makes a contribution to a man's wealth doesn't border on the absurd - it crossed that frontier miles back, got its passport stamped and was given the keys to the kingdom.

The simple fact that no woman will ever concede this point, no matter how easy it is to demonstrate, is proof enough of why this fiction is maintained. In their minds, their interests come before any man's. All reason and logic, all argument, are to be used to serve their primacy of interest.

So Buck, and any other young guy reading this, take it from an older dude that your instincts are 100% reliable. Stay single, stay sane and enjoy your life.

Really, what the man is saying is the truth. Women don't have an implicit right to have their husband support them when they're no longer supporting him - they may have had a right to a minimum level of support when they were doing work like raising children or cooking meals or cleaning house, but when the levels of arrogance displayed by modern women have reached such extremes as to claim that they should be paid $138,000 for work that amounts to nothing, they should be lucky to get kicked out with the clothes on their body.

But of course that's not what happens. What happens is that the golden parachute is made out of the skin of the slave, and then salt is poured onto his body with the double jeopardy of child support and alimony. All of this is after a marriage where he presumably gave his all and worked long hours to support the bitch at home and thought that the marriage was for life, through thick and thin. Turns out it was - thick for her, thin for him. Ha Ha Ha.

Its really a wonder that so many men marry even today. Its the natural instinct and centuries of social conditioning in us, we want to spread our seed, but if that's not gonna happen, at least pass on our genes. And the feminists have made full use of that, to push through ever more punishing laws. Do you think its a coincidence that the 500 year old law that states that any children born during marriage are presumed to be the husband's is still in the books?

MGTOW is the answer to these blatantly unfair laws. "Must keep her in a manner to which she is accustomed to" my ass. I will not be a slave.

If men as a group won't stand up to tyranny for once in history, we must each work for ourselves. The last person I expect shaming language from is a fellow man, but unfortunately, the first person I get insults and shaming language from is usually a man.

On Child Abuse

Continuing from my "Trippin'" post...

 

I met an old lady who I thought was wonderful and kind, but who showed her true colors yesterday. Anyway, this old hag has a fat daughter. This fat daughter has the accomplishment of being a single mom at the age of 20. Yes, she is 20 years old, weighs more than 250 lbs and has a 18 month old daughter.

 

This 18 month old daughter is the subject of my post. These guys live like hicks in the middle of California, just minutes away from the $1+ million homes of the Napa valley. There are geese honking and shitting in the front yard, a deaf dog, and the everpresent rusty old cars. So it isn't a wonder that the (grand)daughter is not in the best condition. I know that the bitch draws welfare (WIC) and probably child support from the father as well.

 

However, the fact is that she is an abused, neglected infant. She is alternately neglected and abused. She has bruises in various places on her body, her mother doesn't give a single shit about her, and she roams barefeet all around the house. Yes, including the outside with all the goose shit. Its no wonder that she has had pus running out of her ear, a chronic hacking cough, and who knows what else. Yesterday the temperature was in the fifties, the old hag didn't want to turn on the heat, and the poor baby was walking around barefoot. Her mom? Sitting cozy with a blanket and fuzzy slippers, talking to her friends and watching TV.

 

I really think I should call and get the poor baby taken out of the fat whore's hands, but I don't know - whom should I call, and will it do any good? Even if they do take the baby, will they give the baby to her father or will they keep her in some kind of government facility? Something tells me that the social services will just come and see that there isn't a single male in the house, and promptly leave.

 

I know the father's name and general address but don't know if I should contact him anonymously or something. And I don't want to upset the apple cart and somehow get myself in trouble or kicked out of the house either.

iVillage propaganda

I was home for lunch, just got back. While I was eating my delicious home-prepared meal, I turned on the TV and the only channel that didn't have ads on when I surfed past it was CBS 11, which was showing a program called "iVillage Live."

iVillage.com is of course a very female-oriented site (how many aren't?) and they mainly cater to housewives or welfare queens. At least that's what I got from the TV program.

After a commercial break, the announcer said that there had been a new recently-released study that said that housewives should earn $138,000 a year. This of course was the blatantly untrue "study" conducted by salary.com last year, which kicked rhyme and reason into the well and made sure to put the largest dollar amounts they could find into the various made up sections. With titles such as CEO for deciding whether to get the Lean Cuisine or the Banquet and CFO for mailing the utility checks, its a wonder they didn't come up with a salary in the millions. (Lean Cuisine and Banquet are TV dinners)

Women of course get a golden parachute when they sever ties, just like top-level execs.

So anyway, they decided to go out on the street and corral unsuspecting proles. First they caught a family of four, which was pretty peaceful. They ostensibly posed questions to the man, but as soon as any female started speaking, the camera and the mic swung to her. Questions like "how much housework do you do" - the man replied "well, I do yard stuff, general guy stuff" and then mid-sentence, the focus shifted to the woman who had just opened her mouth.

So anyway, the "Certified Public Accountant" that was with them calculated that the woman earns $80,000 per year, and the man earns....

...

$17.76. Yup. The man earns less than twenty bucks a year for cooking, doing the "guy stuff" (defined as all the dangerous work around the house) and the woman earns $80,000 for cleaning.

OK, on to the next victim. They corral a black man with his 3-4 daughters, and ask him, "how much housework do you do." The man misunderstands the question and says he is a truck driver. So as the presenter is clarifying, the little pipsqueak, she must have been 7 at the most, pipes up - "HE DRIVES A TRUCK AND WATCHES TV" and the poor guy is relegated to the background while the "Certified Public Accountant" says "$14.92".

Yep, apparently your true market work is worthless on daytime TV. Driving a truck is on the same level as crashing on the couch and watching TV. And the worst part is, this was the young daughter saying this and the presenter allowing the child to speak before the father. Need any more proof that men are spit on by everyone else in this society and that male is a curse word?

Trippin'

Hey folks, sorry for the interruption. I've been on a road trip. I have moved, and my new address is Wine Country, USA.

Yessiree, I am officially in the People's Republic of California. Wine country actually, about an hour north of San Francisco. There is a winery/wine resort within walking distance of my new place, and my work is a 20 minute walk or a 5 minute bike ride. People pay very good money to visit here and drive on the same roads that make up my daily commute. It is so peaceful here in the country, a complete change from my usual big city living.

Yes, the life of a consultant is not that easy. :-D

The only thing I'd change are the bugs. A metric shit-ton of them trying to get in from every nook and cranny, and let me tell you - I hate bugs. Always have. They frighten and disgust me. So I really dislike not being able to go out after dark for fear of bugs, whether they bite, crawl or just brush up against me.

Anyway, an unfortunate side effect of the move to this beautiful place is that high-speed internet is not available here. I hope to get it soon, because I'm going to go nuts here. The old lady who rented me the house is very sweet, but her daughter is a real piece of work. I'm actually going to do a piece about that bitch. Every encounter I have with a piece of shit like that, and seeing the power she has in the court system further cements my desire to never marry, and to never have children with a woman in the US or any other feminised state, until women themselves take to the streets along with men in a show of solidarity like so many misguided men did back in the sixties.

Punishment fitting the crime

I have studiously stayed out of the Duke rape case through its entire lifecycle - the case started before I began blogging and I just was sick of all the coverage it got, both in the MSM and in the MRA blogger community so I never wrote about it. Of course, it was found that Crystal Gail Mangum (what the fuck kind of a name is that?) was lying and everyone is focusing on the next most convenient man to take the fall. Everyone is coming out against Nifong, but of course the lying bitch who filed the accusations got off without any damage.



I was going through Glenn Sacks's archives and saw this post about false rape accusations.



In the comments section,

1. Ben Says:
   
   April 22nd, 2007 at 3:05 pm

   Here is a case of a false accusation that without a video tape would have resulted in decades of prison time for the young men.

   http://www.ocweekly.com/news/news/great-dick-babe/24507/

   Woman did receive jail time for perjury and filing a false police report.

This story is about a slut who filed false rape accusations about a group of men who she claims hooded and gang-raped her, but it turns out that not only was she wide awake during the entire thing, but also was not satisfied with some of the men's penis size.

Next month an Orange County jury will hear the case against Moonier
(now Kerr following her marriage). Interesting footnote: without the
videotape, the men could have spent the rest of their lives in state
prison if they were convicted of kidnapping and aggravated rape with a
handgun. But the woman’s false accusation is a misdemeanor punishable
by no more than six months in county jail. It’s only because she took
several thousand dollars from a taxpayer-funded victims’ assistance
program that she was charged with two felonies.

False rape accusers are routinely let go, if they are caught in the first place - the overarching philosophy behind any rape accusation is that "she is right" - whether she is the rapist, or the alleged rapee. This is how women are able to get off whether they falsely accuse or commit statutory rape.



I don't know whether its feminist training that compels judges to view any females they see in their courts as angels fallen from the sky, or their own traditional thinking, but I'm inclined to believe its the former. Especially after reading about the MIT Admissions Dean who was forced to resign on Friday, April 27, 2007 after she made waves in the feminist university system with a report on why boys are falling behind in education.



Back to false rape accusations - why is someone who has calculated to abuse the justice system to ruin someone's life with a false rape accusation punished less than someone caught lifting a pack of gum at the local 7-11?



Why does the punishment never fit the crime when a female is the criminal?

Wake up and smell the misandry

More and more men are waking up... I saw this comment on Glenn Sacks's blog.

bretgarrison Says:
January 25th, 2007 at 12:59 pm

Dear Glenn,

After reading your recent column in the Chicago Tribune “Women don’t want men??….HA!!” I just had to track you down and thank you for speaking on behalf of all men and helping to share the WHOLE TRUTH and tell the WHOLE STORY. Personally, I’m getting tired of hearing only one half of the story….The woman’s side.

Your article was right on target. I am 47-years old and have been listening to women blabber on endlessly about how sorely deficient the men are in their lives. This has been told so many times before that I swear this has become an accepted truth in our culture. In order to verify this, all you have to do is look at any TV sitcom and/or movie and see how the men-of-today are portrayed as compared to the woman. The men are now the thoughtless, bumbling, fools and the woman are smart and sexy and tolerant of their men. The truth is, men don’t stick up for themselves because up till now they have hardly cared about the static noise going on around them. In my mind, this static noise is now becoming much too harsh and unfair and frequent. As you have pointed out on your web-page, if this negative image had been reversed, women would be enraged and extremely vocal about it. The double standard against men does now exist and in my mind, needs to be corrected. I can’t thank you enough for doing your part to educate men (and woman) about this double standard and telling our side of the story and telling the WHOLE TRUTH.

I can think of plenty of female leaders who are doing their part in educating woman about “the double standard” that exists in our world today. And I greatly respect that women do support each other. Having smart, capable, enlightened woman in our lives is good for all of us.
But this said, it is becoming over-due that men start becoming aware of the “double standard” that exists in our world today as well. And that is, woman have gone too far with their male bashing. Just like you, (and Jeff Leving), I see it more-n-more that men are getting the short end of the stick. And from what I can see, it’s solely because woman whine, bitch, moan, complain, cry about their plight. In other words, the squeaky wheel is getting all the spare oil. Thank you so much for counter balancing some of this wrongful female rhetoric. When I hear the words, “You go girl”…I am now starting to think…”yeah..go!!…please go!!”. Us men have PLENTY of our own to tolerate in woman. There is no bad-guy or good-girl in the Battle of the Sexes. To me, it’s clearly half-n-half. But the simple fact remains, men do NOT get nearly the air-time that woman do.

In writing this, please do NOT think for one minute that I hate women. On the contrary, I adore women and firmly believe that they are God’s gift to man. In fact, because I am single, most of my spare time is spent with women. But this said, I’ll be damn if I am going to give one single shred of my dignity and self respect and self image just because they feel they have been slighted and are therefore waging a smear campaign against men. I can easily think of a equal number of woman, (as men) who are thoughtless, self-centered, manipulative, cunning, etc, etc. It serves no purpose to portray men this way and/or take careful aim at each other. But if this is the war they want….I say bring it on!!! The work you are doing is much appreciated by me. Thanks again for being our general.

Best Regards,
Bret Garrison
bretgarrison@mac.com

You know, I think there are plenty of men out there (yes, even on FSTDT, even on Pandagon, even on heilhillary.com) who are aware of how much men are being short-changed in our society. Its extremely politically incorrect to speak about how men can be victims too, especially in leftist circles when half your "friends" are feminists, women-firsters who would sooner burn you alive than admit that Clara Harris committed murder or that male circumcision is also genital mutilation.

When I was young(er), there was nothing for a man who had a nagging feeling that maybe the world wasn't quite as it was made out to be - that maybe women were not really oppressed by "having" to stay home and clean up, maybe saying that men and women are equal and then turning around and claiming that women are better parents was hypocritical, maybe the wage gap was a lie.

But there was nothing to support me. If I had said this to my mother, I would have earned a slap or a disappointed look, if I had said this to my father, he would probably give me a lecture on what it means to be a man (all responsibilities, all obligations, no rights), and if I had said this to my friends, I would have been labeled a woman-hater and lost friendship because to them, pussy was above all else - the pursuit of a lay was the overriding impetus for their actions. And of course for most of my own. Can you imagine a 14 year old boy, even today, admitting to his peers that he was sexually abused by his teacher? He knows how they would react and he either keeps his mouth shut or talks about it in bragging tones.

Now, websites and blogs for men's rights are springing up all over. Governments are of course panicking, and we have legislation coming up from the birthplace of the Nazi and fascist movements to restrict freedom of speech online. But to the point, someone who browses the Internet today is far more likely to encounter an anti-feminist or men's rights blog than someone who searched two years ago, even someone who searched one year ago.

And I'm happy to do my part. :-)