Thursday, November 30, 2006
Well, let's take a look at one photobucket user's account. These are all pictures from the same account.
Yup, even just not being a total fugly lardass entitles women to be total cunts. The funny thing is that the first three images could probably be found on millions of myspace webpages, blogs etc. Women think that just by possessing the "right" organs, they can be as bitchy as they want and men will be all over them no matter what. Misandry sure is good for a laugh!
Wednesday, November 29, 2006
I know a few of my readers are still on 800x600 resolution, please let me know if this doesn't work or something. Cheers!
Entering your email gets you a page which tells you how to buy this wonderful new book, no secret unlocking or anything like that. I'm sure you can imagine what the book will contain - lots of blaming, lots of shaming, lots of "You go girl!" and lots of "He didn't deserve you anyway, you special, unique flake... err snowflake."
Let's go over the promises this book makes...
How to decode men's behavior.
This chapter explains how to get men to spend more money on you.
Why men pull away as things start to get serious.
This chapter explains how to suck him into the trap before he realizes what's going on. With a bonus section on palimony and how you too can strike it rich!
Men's 6 secret commitment fears EXPOSED.
Well, there's domestic violence - his bank accounts, his job, and his children, all of these can be snatched away with one phone call. With no-fault divorce, Men commit, women don't. What else, oh and he knows that you will turn into a vile shrew as soon as the vows are done. As far as I'm concerned, the "you may kiss the bride" should be "You may now blow the groom to demonstrate your commitment."
11 Simple Steps to attracting men.
How best to display your wares, you budding whore you.
The Calling game decoded.
How to wait by the phone waiting for the playerz to call while ignoring the "nice guys" who are, like, so pathetic, right?
Tuesday, November 28, 2006
Here we have the 27-point wishlist of a deluded woman who claims to be a feminist (don't most of them? They're sure happy as fuck to claim the benefits and use the unfair laws whether or not they self-identify as feminists.)
Dilnavaz's List of Relationship Non-negotiables
Respects and trusts me a significant amount — my character, my profession, my mind, my choices. (I've made a few bad choices and I want someone to save me, not to lecture me. Plus I may cheat and I don't want to be questioned on it)
Is an avid reader - and not only of comic books, please! (I read Femina and trashy romance novels since I think comic books are for kids)
Is open to communication and can effectively engage in debate and discussion a significant amount of time (Communicate = I will "communicate" at him till his balls shrivel up)
Has a sharp mind that he is willing to give freely of. (I may be dumb but I sure am not admitting it)
Is a non-smoker (for those of you who don't know, I'm hideously allergic) (Hideous is right)
Has a reasonable level of education (Earns big bucks)
Fights fair (Lets the girl win every time)
Has a liberal social outlook and an active social conscience (I'm a puppet of leftist media and I expect him to be too)
Is non-religious — no formal worship or rituals for me (The only rituals I'll allow are those involving the worship of ME ME ME)
Shares at least some of my important values and life goals (Earns big bucks)
Likes children at least somewhat - given that I've already named mine, it would be helpful if he did! (I'm totally inflexible, and have an unrealistic view of a partnership)
Is committed to the relationship and willing to work for it (He buys me stuff when I get mad)
Is emotionally available and capable of demonstrating affection (He buys me stuff when I get mad)
Recognizes that my freedom cannot be curtailed unless it is significantly affecting our relationship — especially when it comes to spending! (Its all about the money, Its all about ME)
Partakes in my excitement and spontaneity in a non-patronizing manner (Follows my plans no matter what)
Shares at least some of my interests/ ideas about fun. I wouldn't know what to do with him if he only liked F1 and nothing else! (He is not allowed to have any interests that are different to mine)
Is non-jealous, non-possessive, and does not expect my life to be a shadow of his (Earns big bucks and doesn't complain when I don't do the same)
Is a lifelong learner who will not stagnate and is supportive when I attempt new paths. (Earns big bucks and doesn't retire)
Does not expect a gender-stereotypical role of me and shares tasks (Does 75% to 100% of the earning and at least 50% of the housework. Because I'm worth it. Or at least my vag is.)
Can communicate well with me in English. I can't fight as well in any other language! (Lost touch with my roots, I also think I am an attractive blonde.)
Is the calmer of the two of us. Two of me would not be fun. (He buys me stuff when I get mad)
Makes a reasonable amount of money, even though I will be an income earner. I make a really grouchy pauper. (Earns big bucks)
Does not engage in physical or emotional violence in any way, shape or form (Domestic Violence = Raising his voice and "withholding" money, and I know how to call 911)
Is tolerant of my quirks. (I will not peel a banana, I cannot sleep on an unmade bed.) (I am a princess and I have a gold-plated vagina.)
Includes me and my opinions in every significant decision making process. (I want all the rights and none of the responsibilities.)
Does not need babying. If I want a child, I will produce/ adopt one. I don't need to marry it. (Earns big bucks and does most of the housework.)
Leaves the toilet seat down. Always, always, always. (I'm a huge cunt, this should be the biggest indicator of that.)
Does not think such a person can't possibly exist. ;-) (I'll throw this in because on some level I know what a whole lot of mental masturbation this was.)
Note that there is no mention of what she brings to the relationship... its implied, "I'm bringing my cunt, which is a very valuable commodity!" Someone teach the bitch that an excess of supply reduces demand. She has twenty-seven fucking items on her goddamn shopping list of male qualities, and the only thing she has is her reproductive organs.
Entitlement princesses come in all shapes, sizes and colors. This one is a fine example.
EDIT: Thanks to Anonymous for pointing out what this princess actually looks like. I hadn't noticed the photo, well maybe I did and my subconscious mind tried to mentally block the ugliness, but here she is in all her glory.
Sunday, November 26, 2006
Have you been getting bored of listening to a lot of nothing on bus rides, in the train or a plane? I thought I'd make a small post about mp3 players since the market is kind of going through an upheaval right now.
Well, there are three kinds of mp3 players. First you have to decide how big a player you want, then you decide on the size, which is largely dictated by the size of your wallet.
There's large, which have 1.8" hard drives and lots of storage. Zune, iPod, iRiver H10 etc all fall in under this category. You'll find players up to a max of 80GB here. These are the most expensive.
There's medium, which have flash or microdrives and are smaller than the hard drive-based players. This includes the iPod nano, Creative Zen Micro Photo, Sandisk sansa e2x0 series etc. You'll find players up to 8-10GB here. (The Sandisk e280 with a 2GB microSD card will give you 10GB). These players have some overlap - you can get a 8GB nano for the same price as a 30GB iPod video for example.
Then there's small, which uses flash but doesn't have a lot of it. All players have a screen, except the super-tiny iPod shuffle, which doesn't. You'll find players up to a max of 4GB here. Most players are in the 1GB and 2GB capacity. These are mostly cheap. The most expensive is probably the iPod shuffle (surprise!) - you can mostly get a 2GB player with a screen for the price of a Shuffle.
There also used to be an Extra-large category, with 2.5" drives, but I don't think they make those anymore.
I just bought a Sandisk sansa e260 4GB for $99 (pictured above), which beats the snot out of any iPod nano. I could go out and buy a 2GB microSD today and turn it into a 6GB player. But any justification for the sansa brings me to my next point:
With any mp3 player other than the iPod, you will have people looking down on you because you "couldn't afford" an iPod. The iPod is the be-all, end-all of mp3 players today, like it or not. Its like buying an Aiwa cassette player because you couldn't afford a Sony Walkman (lol child of the 80's). Or buying an Acura because you couldn't afford a BMW. People don't care about features or anything, they just see "not iPod" and automatically assume you couldn't afford "the best." (read: the most expensive)
Well, I hope this post helped if anyone was looking at mp3 players. Back to your regularly scheduled commentary tomorrow!
The two men who were directly insulted by Michael Richards’ racist burst last week have reportedly asked for money as a compensation for the offenses he brought them, according to their lawyer.
It all makes sense now. All the commotion, all the hullaballoo, all for a shot at the money. While I can't say I didn't expect it, its still shocking when the motive comes through clear as day.
"It's not enough to say 'I'm sorry,' " Gloria Allred, their attorney said.
"He went after them. He singled them out and he taunted them, and he did it in a closed room where they were captive."
Ooh, the poor poor men were captive! Captive in a room where they left shortly after making notes on how best they could fleece a washed-out comedian.
This is what happens when white guilt lets people get away with ridiculous shit. The same principle applies to male guilt, except that blacks were actually oppressed. One other thing we have to see is whether hurt emotions are enough for a judgement and reparations now. If it turns out that, yes, you do get money for being offended and complaining about it if you're a member of so-and-so group with lots of political clout, we will have a great situation on our hands. We all know the other "minority" which has lots of real-life political clout and is conditioned for thousands of years to complain long and bitterly so that a saviour may come and save them.
Yep, you guessed right - women.
Saw this sad article when I was browsing through the Daily Male Hate website. The story is about a boy who was bullied for God knows how long, and who eventually committed suicide by hanging himself. But then the old hag begins the article with an account of what pretty much every man in the UK must live with - chavs on a train. From what I've heard, they're a bloody empidemic over there. My condolences to anyone who has suffered close contact with one of these creatures.
At the beginning of last week, which was national Anti-Bullying Week, I was travelling to Weston-super-Mare. Suddenly two men in their early 20s appeared in my train compartment, shouting and throwing water over each other.
They chucked rubbish everywhere, laughing boisterously, then ran up and down the aisle so wildly that I wondered whether they were drunk.
An old man pushing the drinks trolley told them the Transport Police would join the train at the next stop, but they clearly knew that was half an hour away.
The yobs slumped down in the seat behind me, still throwing water over each other. Uneasy, I decided to try to calm them. But as soon as I spoke they started making gross sexual comments to me and about me. The situation was becoming very threatening.
The irony was that I was on my way to an anti-bullying conference, and suddenly I had become a target myself.
I was shocked not just by the language and the attitude of these louts, but by their simple lack of respect. (respect my VAGINA!)
They didn't care that they were making a mess, disturbing other passengers, and that it's hardly normal behaviour to insult an elderly woman. But their behaviour is, alas, all too common.
Now, bullying is typically defined in colloquial speech as a form of harassment perpetrated by someone who is in some way more powerful, physically or socially, than a weaker peer. So this old lady promptly rushes to define herself as a victim, despite being under virtually no threat compared to a man the same age, or pretty much any age. Warren Farrell blew the violence myth apart in his book, "The Myth of Male Power" with statistics like this: a 65 year old man is 3 times more likely to suffer a form of violence than his female counterpart. And that's if he lives to be that old. Naturally, women claim that their suffering is more because they exclusively have a vagina, and well, that vagina needs to be protected! Men, with their assholes are worth nothing but a good laugh at the de riguer prison rape and "don't drop the soap" jokes.
Anyway, back to the poor boy who was bullied. Oh wait, this journalist obviously has ADD, she could not focus on the boy for more than a few sentences. She starts on about some girl who hung herself because nobody would hang out at the mall with her. Obviously that is the same as "for two years he had been bullied, taunted, spat at, pushed down the bus stairs and had his earring torn out." Yeah, the feminized school system was just preparing him for a life of hard knocks.
You know, I wonder. Do these self-righteous prats keep statistics on bullying by gender? I'd really like to see the incidence of female-on-male bullying and compare that to male-on-female bullying. And let's not even touch on the issue of the girls who just bat their eyes and the testosterone charged boys rush to kill - girls who bully indirectly.
Saturday, November 25, 2006
I don't know, I've never seen either one.
Her lips are moving.
The old drunk, of course; the other three are mythological creatures.
"Not at all, Ma'am," the manager replied. "It is because our employees are used to obeying orders, are accustomed to being shoved around, know how to keep their mouths shut and don't pout when I yell at them." (this one was unmodified)
The sex is the same but the dishes pile up.
The police then go to the next door neighbor to verify this report and the lady next door tells the police, "You can't believe him. She's 5 feet 2 inches tall, has a butch haircut and wears a perpetual frown on her face and her cooch wouldn't melt butter."The neighbor then goes and asks the gentleman why he gave the police such a false report.
He replies, "Just because I reported her missing, doesn't mean I wanted her back!"
When she starts her sentence with "A man once told me ..."
About 45 pounds.
They can irritate the shit out of you.
The man, because the woman has to ask directions on the way down.
"Well then, strip down to your waist," orders the doctor. She takes off her top and bra and sits on the examing table. The doc starts pressing, kneading and pinching both breasts for quite a while in a very detailed and thorough examination.
The doc motions to her to get dressed, then the doctor says: "No wonder this baby is so hungry. You don't have any milk!
"The woman with a wry grin on her face responds: "Well of course I don't. I cut this cute little baby out of my friend's womb and left her for dead - but I'm sure glad I brought him in!
He then faced the judge and jury and calmly declared, "I would say it was about one-tenth that hard."
Thursday, November 23, 2006
Apparently, there was a movement by the name of "Wages for Housework" in the mid 70's. The feminists' complaint? That women do a lot of work inside the home and this should be added to the GNP, used to pay off debt to the IMF/World Bank and all sorts of other hare-brained entitlement schemes.
Today, for men, marrying is a very dicy proposition. There can be any number of things demanded of you, Mr. Wage Slave. This wages for housework thing is very interesting - you are supposed to pay your wife maid wages, so does she pay you for the rent? Do you get to cut all the food she stuffs in her maw out of her fees? Can you fire her if she doesn't do the job to satisfaction? Oh wait, no you can't do any of that, you just pay up and shut up. And if you don't, the jackbooted thugs will just take your house and give it to her and force you into indentured servitude to pay for her lifestyle.
Wages for Housework
Pop-feminists are demanding laws requiring men to pay their wives housewife wages: "In the United Kingdom and other countries, there is a movement, 'Wages for Housework,' which advocates the idea that the husband should pay the wife for her services within the house -- especially if she works fulltime at home, doing the child rearing and cooking, cleaning, etc." (Women & Love, St. Martin's Press mass market edition, 1989, Shere Hite, p 383)
Thus, pop-feminist complaints against male housekeeping habits have nothing to do with the work itself, but with manufacturing excuses to force men to subsidize women even more than they already do. Rather than granting credibility to their unwarranted complaints, we should suggest they find out why men marry.
Do men marry for housekeeping services? Unlikely. A once a week maid service could be cheaper and more convenient. Do men marry for sex? No. As Warren Farrell points out, marriage means infrequent and poorer quality sex for men. (Why Men Are The Way They Are, Berkley edition/September 1988, Warren Farrell, Ph.D., pp 171 - 172) A twice a week whore would probably be more satisfying and cheaper.
Essentially, pop-feminists are trying to reduce women to the role of subsidized whores and housekeepers. If they succeed, men might be better off boycotting marriage.
But men already pay their housewives something more valuable than money -- time. Women who don't have a job outside the home have time to do things. Time to read, study, think, create, compose music, invent, and build and reshape the world. Instead, many spend six hours a day doing a job that "can be capably handled by an eight-year-old child." (The Feminine Mystique, Betty Friedan, pp 245)
Women have never had it so good. That doesn't mean their lives cannot be better. But turning them into subsidized housekeepers and whores with "wages for wives" is not the way to do it.
And making their lives better certainly doesn't mean taking from the men's pockets and subsidizing women in everything they do.
Happy Thanksgiving to all my American readers! 'Tis the day to be thankful, so here I am...
I am thankful for my country's anti-divorce laws, so I was raised in an intact home.
I am thankful to my family for raising me and shaping me.
I am thankful to my father for being a father to me, giving me a sense of direction and supporting me through some of my blackest periods.
I am thankful for my God-given abilities, intelligence and looks. Whatever I have, I make do with.
I am thankful for my place in the world, as a relatively high-earning man in the richest country in the world. Thankful with the knowledge that it can be snatched away in the blink of an eye.
Love you all, may you all have something to be equally grateful and thankful for.
Wednesday, November 22, 2006
Saw this comment over at Eternal Bachelor.
Regarding out of wedlock births in the USA soaring, this is due to the tremendous success of the ever escalating Marriage Strike of the American Male!
Go American males! I've even made up a little cheer for our boys:
We'll give no ring,
We'll give no vows,
We'll turn those witches
But seriously, if we would also just completely stop giving single women any of our sperm, we could bring this whole matter to a head (so to speak)and cause a sane, sensible and peaceful settlement of the Femnazi-initiated gender war in America.
Until we American guys succeed in completely withholding our DNA -- not just our marital vows -- women will not be forced to join forces with us men to drive sanity and equality back into our legal system when it comes to family matters.
So I offer this original poem to your blog readers:
No Sperm No ring,
Until you sing,
To set men free,
from the lawyers' spree.
You chicks are pawns,
to pay for lawns
of houses big
of the lawyer pigs!
Stop being used in this stupid scam
if you ever hope to have your Fam!
See American women need to make our legislatures know that even they are sick of the female-victim culture here and its horrible consequences for women.
We need to help them connect up how all of this "protection" is actually making them so unattractive that we guys would rather stick our dicks into the back of an electric fan than get involved with them.
I like this kind of work, mostly because I'm no literary genius myself. In fact, I pretty much suck at poetry and most prose.
One thing I do believe is that the marriage strike as an organized movement hasn't gained much strength yet - most men (and yes, women) are avoiding marriage because of a multitude of reasons.
Many men are avoiding, or rather, delaying marriage because of reasons like staying in college until later, being afraid of financial ruin until they get lonely and their resolve breaks down, and not being able to find a good woman. Feminists are trying to train men to look for women around their own age, and a 25 year old guy looking for a 25 year old girl isn't going to find one willing to commit. The women start their shrill whining about "no good men" and "men are afraid of commitment" and "I want to stop working, someone bankroll me, I have a vagina and I know how to use it!" around 30+, when their biological clocks start ticking.
Many women are delaying marriage because they really think that they don't need a man - the reality of their ticking clock doesn't hit them until men stop approaching them and they realize they're not growing any prettier. In their prime, they reject the decent men and fuck the exciting bad boys, and when they pass their prime they realize their Plan B has already walked down the aisle with a different woman. Some do realize that their chances of finding a good man go down with each birthday, but many don't. Marriage at a young age is seen as a loser thing to do - why stay with one man when you could have a different one every night?
Monday, November 20, 2006
Being a Men's Rights Advocate is not only about avoiding marriage and children - its about reforming the biased feminist Family Court system so that our brothers who are currently stuck in this trap can extricate themselves. To that end, this is a handy-dandy Frappr map that I found a while back; you can put yourself on this map and see how many other like-minded individuals are close to you.
Sunday, November 19, 2006
The typical man, traditionally, has been so deferential to — and fearful of — women that he automatically will allow one to commandeer the dating, engagement, wedding, marriage, and divorce phases of his life. Then, he will kick himself afterwards and cry into the beer of anyone sympathetic enough to listen. Surrendering these phases to her is akin to riding a runaway train — The Estrogen Express — to Disasterville. The only question is, Will he disembark in time to avert the inevitable?
When you think about it, the traditional way of dealing with a woman is to permit her to control your life. Men mistakenly believe they will have more peace that way. This moronic behavior, based on the false assumption that men must crawl through broken glass to get laid, leads to devastating consequences. It’s quite scary to realize how much control over their lives men have conceded to women, with lots of help from misandric feminists and politicians.
But, it seems that the tide is now turning. Men are increasingly saying no to marriage and relationships, and the Census Bureau statistics prove it. Alas, the out-of-wedlock birthrate (see my article “Playing Abortion Chess”) also proves it. Men are finally realizing that they don’t have to get married and don’t want to get married. They are tired of playing a losing game against the house. To modern men, matrimony equals alimony — not safety, comfort, and love.
When I see a million women marching on the Mall in Washington, DC, demanding that our elected officials restore dignity to men and fathers and the family unit, I will become convinced that they truly believe in matrimony — not just alimony and child support. Until then, I’m not holding my breath.
A really cool graphic, wise words, and an accurate depiction of how things are today.
- A repost of the 'Shame tactics' please
- If Men have the Power, How Come Women Make the Rules
- Lawrence Shannon - The Predatory Female: A Field Guide to Dating and the Marriage-Divorce Industry
- Sex-Ploytation - How Women Abuse Men Using Their Sexuality
- Shaming Language How to Beat It
Lots of good reading. Very insightful, and I would recommend buying some more MRA books or renting from the library and sending the authors a donation or a letter to encourage them to keep writing. Also, take a look around the rest of my site for more writings on men's rights, MGTOW and antifeminist issues.
Many MRA's know this already - that's why we have a name for it, we call it Shaming Language. Some have been known to refer to it as Feminist Bingo, the idea being to get the most points with all the cliche personal attacks feminists make on blogs and forums.
I have noticed that feminists like to downplay the negatives of women and do the exact opposite for men. So a discussion about the famous turkey baster girlfriend, who came into the news in a big way some time ago, turned into a debate about how many men were afraid of the child support and divorce grabfest. The feminists came out with the tired stereotypes about the poor abused wymen who don't have a choice, who are lumped with the chilluns by the evial patriarchal courts, et cetera et cetera. They even try to blame the divorce rate on men - and when confronted with the data showing that 75% of divorces are initiated by the women, try to downplay it or keep blaming abusive inhuman stupid men. Its like an experiment I read about in "If Men have the Power, How come Women Make the Rules?" Great book, by the way, I fully recommend downloading it from the above link. In that survey, two sets of study respondents were given two different statements - one was told that men initiate 75% of divorces, and one was told that women initiate 75% of divorces.
Both groups blamed men. It is simply not in our societal makeup to blame women for anything, and I don't blame us - women have come along and have taken more than their fair share of rights in less than a blink of an eye by civilization's standards.
Anyway, when the feminists came along to the discussion, the shaming language started. First of all was the assumption that women are too good for the nerds on the forum, along with this gem: "Who would want your sperm anyway, you creepy paranoid nerd?"
Essentially, that's like shaming someone who is expressing fear that his brand new Mercedes will be stolen if he leaves it outside in the ghetto with the keys in the ignition. Even better, accusing him of racism because he knows that the neighborhood is full of minorities and is thus implying that minorities are more likely to steal. Political correctness, you go too far.
Leave alone the fact that these cunts are on the very same forum that they allege is home to such nerds, benefiting from all sorts of pro-female discrimination - posts are censored heavily to avoid offending these fragile flowers and users are often banned when they express skepticism about a girl's attention whoring. Then the forum has the dubious claim of being 'the most pro-female forum around.'
Its a pity that pro-female always means anti-male. Feminism really is a zero-sum game, isn't it.
Thursday, November 16, 2006
The other day, I was watching Family Guy. If you aren't familiar with this show, it was a great show when it started out, then progressively got worse and worse over the years. The main issue most people have with the show now is that the jokes aren't funny, and it makes too much use of non-sequiturs.
Last week's show was about Brian, the talking dog, and his new girlfriend, the bimbo. Stewie, the talking baby, thinks Brian's reticence to show his girlfriend to the family is because she's ugly. Brian takes Stewie to see her to rectify this flawed assumption. Stewie learns that she is pretty, but also pretty dumb. The rest of the show is about making fun of Brian for having a bimbo girlfriend.
Why is Brian made fun of for preferring a "bimbo" - the stereotypical hot but dumb blonde, the nemesis of every NYMOM or other ugly feminist out there?
I think it goes back to not allowing men to have standards. Women think that they should be selected for their personality, their "careers", their intellect and their cats when that's all they have, but men are primarily interested in beauty and youth. What really bothers me is how much we men have internalized this message to the point where we truly want to believe that an ugly woman deserves to be looked at for her personality, and not as a consolation prize. Some of the ugliest women I've known have had the blackest hearts, poisoned by a lifetime of seeing the pretty girls get higher prices in the wholesale market of dating and mating.
So, the point. Why does everyone imply that Brian should pick based on the selection criteria they deem important? The girl is hot, and if that's what matters to Brian, then that's what matters. No one else needs to tell him what criteria he should select his mate on.
If I want a stupidly hot girlfriend but can't afford la creme de la creme, the hot and intelligent ones, its my duty and my right to fulfill my obligation to myself and put physical attractiveness before intelligence or personality.
Wednesday, November 15, 2006
Here's the actual article: Doctor ordered to pay for unwanted baby.
The doctor must pay his former patient, now a mother of a three-year-old boy, 600 euros ($769) a month because she became pregnant after he implanted her with a contraceptive device.
When it comes to a fat wallet, any nearby man will do! The sperm donor not rich enough? Just look around, you're bound to have interacted with someone richer than him, you GO girl! Or is that go-go girl? Whateva, I'm empowered!!
Here's two more gems:
It should be welcomed that a doctor can now be held to account in the same way as a shoddy plumber
[The court ruled that] The father should also be compensated for the maintenance he was paying toward the child.
This is so awesome. Any bets on how much money the Dad will actually receive? I'm thinking of a number... a number between zilch and nada.
Not only does he mistakenly think that Oregon is between Tennessee and Alabama (references to country boy lifestyle), but he is stupid enough to be a sperm donor for some alternative lifestyle cunt's ticking biological clock, enabling yet another single mother to raise a fatherless child. Yes, he says the following:
R and I agreed that we would have unprotected sex, so that she could have a baby. We also agreed that she was going to be a single parent, that whatever involvement I would have in her child's life, it would not be as what is conventionally thought of as a "father".
This was R's choice, all the way: she's the one who wanted a baby, she's the one who paid me the compliment of inviting me to contribute my DNA (looking at myself and my immediate family, I'm not sure that was the wisest choice, but it was hers), she's the one who set the terms. I chose to accept them, because I think she's going to make a superb parent, single or otherwise.
Belatedly, he added with a wistful look in his eye, "Someday, I'm sure I will get the honor of having to pay child support for eighteen to twenty-one years, and maybe they'll even throw me in jail for being late once or twice! Ooh, tickle my sphincter!"
And the apple of his eye, the sauerkraut in his bun, what does she say?
For a longtime I made a personal choice not to have men in life as anything more than friends. Today, there is a part of me that now wishes I hadn't changed my mind...
It gets better. This "R" person is a friend - he already has a wife. Stupidity knows no bounds.
Tuesday, November 14, 2006
I have never supported feminism. Its true that a lot of people support feminism because they naively believe the dictionary definition - that it is about equality and equal rights.
I never bought that. Ever since I could recite my A B C's, I could tell that girls were favored, and boys weren't. I was repeatedly abused by a teacher for three years who was divorced and would only hit boys, but of course you couldn't tell that she was motivated by some other urge because nobody ever hit the girls.
When I was in school, boys were still getting the top scores, but it was easy to see how school was changing - we barely had any male teachers from K-12. The male teachers were mostly of the hard sciences or mathematics.
All of this was in a 3rd world country, not the US. Feminism has still not permeated it to the extent that it has in the first world, but the rot is spreading. When I was in Grade 8, I saw an article about how boys were damaged due to growing favoritism towards girls, and it was then, as I tried to show the article to the class, that I earned my first beating for being an MRA. Yep, chivalry is still alive, as is bullying.
When I landed in the US, I was horrified by what I saw. Women had all sorts of privileges and rights, they were horribly stuck up, being a man and talking or touching any man was considered gay, women had so much authority and power in the universities, there was a Women's Center but no Men's Center, and the TV, oh god the TV was a box spewing misandric crap 24/7 (didn't know the word but I sure got the message). It was too much, so I turned to the Internet and got exposed to the MRA message, bit by bit.
Did you ever support feminism?
An old woman, alone.
And old man, not alone.
For some time now, I've been working on a new operating philosophy on the subject of being single. And the experiences of a good friend who recently got married has kind of helped to crystallize it.
For about a year leading up to the engagement, this guy agonized over whether he should ask her to marry him. And his main problem wasn't over the fact that she was already divorced and had two small kids from a previous marriage to a guy who was kind of a nutcase. It wasn't even over the fact that her Islamic parents refused to even meet him because he was a Jew.
He couldn't decide if he should marry her because she wasn't particularly good looking and she just didn't really turn him on at all. And after he told me about this for the about sixteenth or seventeenth time, I finally asked him if he loved her. And his answer was really interesting. He said that, now that he was in his mid-30s, he was afraid this would be his last chance to find somebody to settle down with, and that sometimes you just have to take the opportunities that are available.
So this guy was so afraid of being single the rest of his life that he married a woman that he didn't really love and that he wasn't even particularly attracted to.
And just the other day, he emailed me to tell me all about what stupid brats the kids are, what a pain in the ass the ex is, and what an "A+ certifiable bitch" the wife is. So I just emailed him back and said, Look dude, this is exactly what you signed up for, and you know it, and the truth is that if you didn't have the stupid brat kids and the pain in the ass ex and the A+ bitch to complain about, that's when you'd really be miserable.
So my theory is that the fear of ending up single drives a lot of people to marry people that they really shouldn't be with. The difference between the guy who posted the craigslist story and most other guys is that he came to his senses before it was too late. Most guys actually would put up with that crap and worse for the rest of their lives.
Everyone you know brainwashes you that that's what's going to happen if you don't marry as soon as possible. Somehow, in today's society, the message is twisted up so that women are told that they are carefree and happy when they're single, and men everywhere are lined up and would drop everything for these princesses if they were asked to. Whereas men are worthless without a girlfriend or wife, and are seen as outcasts if they are single.However, real life is totally different.
Women have all the power from about puberty to 30-35, then its all downhill. A 40 year old man can easily find a hot 25 year old woman to settle down with, but nobody's going to be looking at a 40 year old woman seriously.
Another MSM lie? Throw it on top of that festering pile over there...
Sunday, November 12, 2006
The identity of the infamous NYMOM has finally been revealed - Margaret Temple, from Columbia University.
(Bottom of the page, somehow, NYMOM appropriately comes in LAST!)
Congratulations to Rob Fedders for digging up the info!
Remember men, she's not a feminist.
Saturday, November 11, 2006
Three judges of the High Court ruled that there could be no action for deceit in cases such as Mr Magill's, as they fell into the private realms of a marriage in which partners' obligations to one another were moral and ethical, not legal.
Yeah I'm sure the man's wallet is just public property, let's spread the good stuff around, here you feminists have a go, lawyers take some, Ms. Ex you get the prime cut for bringing this well-fed example into our midst.
So its telling the truth about a child's father is just a woman's moral responsibility - its not her legal responsibility to tell the truth about something as major and life-changing as bringing a child into this world. Nice. I wonder if it would be just a moral obligation to tell my wife how much I earn, or whether I received a promotion or not at work. No, her lawyers have the right and the ability to get everything and anything related to my finances from me. Do women get any responsibilities at all?
It just sickens me that brazenly anti-male rulings like these are being made everyday around the world. In the US the argument is couched as, "Well, the child only knows you as a Dad, and Dads are nothing but walking wallets anyway, so keep paying buster."
Some may disagree with my radical stance, but here it is anyway: It is going to get much worse before it gets better. Exercise your options - don't marry, don't cohabit if you live in a state or nation where cohabitation is a license to rape a man, and don't have children unless you're damn damn DAMN sure your partner is a saint who will never kick you out of your own house and out of your own kids' life. Oh, and get a vasectomy if you are reasonably sure you don't want to be suckered. The birth control Pill for Men is but a distant dream at present and this is the only contraception alternative we have to abstinence.
Friday, November 10, 2006
This post is sort of a reversal of that, but with far less serious consequences for the woman involved. Links change, so I'll mirror the content here. With anti-feminist material, its good to have all the information spread out so that when the feminists win a small victory (like Ilkka's blog or the old dontmarry boards) the war is not lost.
I'll try to sum up a funny story that happened a few years ago:
I got a vasectomy.
I met a girl soon afterwards. She was nice and attractive but with a selfish streak that raised a big red flag. She was 32 at the time and I could practically HEAR her biological clock ticking. Regardless, she was a good lay, easy on the eyes, and reasonably good company.
I did NOT tell her about my vasectomy and I always used a condom with her to protect against STDs. She assumed, obviously, that the condom was only used for birth control. Silly girl.
We date for a few months. I never made any move towards committment but she brought it up occassionally. For me, this was a casual but pleasant relationship. For her - as I was to find out - it was part of life-changing series of events that she was planning very carefully.
Four months into dating, I get the "I'm pregnant" talk. She's going on and on about how the condom must have broke and now we really need to think about getting married "for the baby". She's positively giddy. She has a baby in her and she thinks she's gonna have a good meal ticket (me) to go along with her new 7lb annuity.
At this point, I'm just as giddy. I get to pull the reverse "oops" on her. I figured that she slept with some bad boy and got knocked up. Good thing I was using condoms! Better still that I have a serious mistrust of women who can't think beyond their own uteri.
So I wait a couple of days to "think about all this." I meet her again. I say I don't want kids and that she should have an abortion. I know where this is going and sure enough it goes there. She goes completely batshit insane on me. There were the usual insults about my manhood. There were threats of legal action. It was all very ugly and I was loving every minute of it.
Well, I let her stew for a few days. She leaves me nasty messages on my phone. She sends awful emails. I'm laughing hysterically.
It was time to drop the hammer. While she was stewing I was busy. First I get a notarized copy from the urologist who performed the vasectomy. Next I get a notorized copy of the TWO test results indicating a "negative test result for sperm" to show I'm sterile and shooting blanks. Finally, I get a letter from a shark attorney stating he has seen the other documents and is prepared to litigate against this woman if she continues to communicate with me in such an unpleasant manner. Also, the letter states that we will insist on DNA testing to show that the baby is not mine. I'm ready.
I meet with this woman at her place. I bring flowers and a small bit of jewelry to show I am willing to reconcile and assume my responsibilities as a new father. I also have stuck in my pocket the documents I have prepared.
She's all giddy again. Her plan is going perfectly - or so she thinks. We talk about our future. We have some pretty good sex. Then, as I am about to walk out the door, I ask her the $64,000 question. "Are you sure that this baby is mine?"
Well, she goes batshit insane again. Hell, she ought to. Her plan could completely unravel if there is ANY question about my paternity. Oh, she's really screaming now. How dare I question her morals. Do I think she's a slut. I'm just trying to weasel out of my responsbilities... blah, blah, blah, yadda, yadda, yadda.
I'm not really mad. I'm kind of embarrassed for her. But since she won't shut up and the neighbors can hear all of this, I ask her to step back inside and sit down. She sits on the sofa and calms down a bit. She is glaring at me with all the moral self-righteousness that only a woman can muster up. She thinks she has me trapped. She is 100% convinced her plan has worked. Oh, the tangled web of lies and deceit she has wrought around herself and I am about to hack through them with a few pieces of paper.
I reach into my pocket slowly. I extract the three pieces of paper and unfold them slowly and deliberately.
I tell her simply, "You're screwed".
Her look doesn't change. There is no way she can fathom what I have prepared.
I continue. "I am sterile"
Her look changes just a bit. Something is beginning to sink in. Naturally, she reverts to women's logic. "You're full of shit. You're trapped and you know it."
I hold up the letter and the test results. "Three months before we met, I had a vasectomy. Here is a notarized letter from him stating what I had done. Here are two test results showing that I tested negative for the presence of sperm. Blanks. I am shooting blanks. That baby inside you is simply not mine."
This woman is not to be swayed by logic and clear documentation. "Bullshit, those are fakes."
I was ready for that. "No, they are real. This last piece of paper is from my attorney. It's a simple letter to you that states if you pursue any kind of legal action against me for child support that I will insist on a DNA test to prove paternity, that is, to prove that your baby is not mine."
I give the woman all the documents. She reads them slowly, deliberately. With each passing second she can feel in her soul that she has made a very bad mistake. With denial swept away, she started to cry. It's a small cry at first. Then it becomes deeper and more painful. By the time she gets to the letter from the lawyer she is sobbing.
I had no sympathy for her. I turned and walked out the door. Even after I closed the door I could still hear her sobbing.
I never heard directly from this woman again. I did hear through my friends that she did indeed have the baby. I also heard that the real father was some guy in a band she had met. I assumed that after 30, women stopped going after musicians, bikers, criminals, and thugs. Silly me for thinking the best of American women.
The Moral of the Story -
Get a vasectomy but keep it a secret.
Beautiful story, poetic justice.
Monday, November 06, 2006
Social scientists who study young love are discovering that contrary to popular belief, male adolescents don't just want to have fun.
Evidently, the researchers are shocked to learn that men aren't "after one thing" as is so eloquently put in the media. In fact, it can often be the girl who is after "that thing"!
And here's something that surprised even Giordano: both boys and girls agreed that girls have the power in heterosexual relationships, including when it comes to sex. "She wanted to do it more than I did," said an 18-year-old male. "She said that I wasn't mature enough and, you know, all that stuff ... I was too young, I was scared, I didn't know what I was doing, I wasn't ready for it ... [But] she was my girlfriend, and that's what she wanted."
Can you imagine the same statement with the genders reversed? Everyone and anyone who reads it would be talking about how the girl was coerced, raped, taken advantage of, et cetera ad nauseam. The fact that girls have all the power in relationships comes as no surprise to a man who has courted a woman. Not only does the girl get to only drop hints if she is interested in a guy, but she also gets to vilify the guy as a stupid oaf if he doesn't get hints as vague as flipping her hair 6 times in 15 minutes as opposed to 4 times in 10 minutes when she is not dropping hints. Women have the right of first refusal, women have the right of physical abuse, the right of physical abuse, and the right to cheat on him and have feminists support her because she did it for "emotional reasons" and because she was "not getting the intimacy she needed."
There were exceptions, of course. Take "Donny," a boy who filled the classic role of the player. At 17, he estimated that he'd had 35 sexual partners, some of whose names he couldn't recall. He had cheated on his girlfriends. He confessed to some physical abuse of them. But the really notable thing about Donny was how few Donnys there were. Fewer than a quarter of the boys surveyed felt that other kids thought of them as players. "That number of [Donny types] is in fact smaller than everybody believes," Giordano says.
Here's the archetypical "bad boy," the one who gets the juices flowing and soaks the panties of his girls. Of course he admits to a little physical abuse, the girls adore him! I believe the 80/20 rules applies here - in high school and pretty much any stage before their biological clocks start ticking, 80% of the girls regularly sleep with 20% of the boys.
It seems as if popular culture is waking up to the reality of the emotionally responsive male. Willowy, sensitive actors like Tobey Maguire and Topher Grace are looming larger on marquees.
Oh, for Christ's sake. These gutterburglars are just replacing one stereotype with another. There are plenty of boys who are strong when they need to be and emotional when they want to be. Boys don't just fit into neatly defined feminist categories that are oh so conveniently defined by women. Boys are not just macho and stoic or wish-washy and emotional.
Friday, November 03, 2006
I recently came across the Rules for Single Women at the dontgetmarried board and posted it on the local craigslist.
When I checked my email the next day, there were quite a few replies waiting for me! I was surprised since I hadn't seen any responses over at craigslist, but here they were, vitriol from single women, vitriol from men, but in there were a couple of gems... its so nice to be able to put a light in someone's life, even if its a dim glimmer of hope.
I really appreciate what you wrote. Feeling pretty pissy about my dating
options. Seeing too many women that are self centered. Yeah, I was in a
bad mood, but your post made my day better. So thank you.
It has Best of CL written all over it.
Whoever you are you are very perceptive and honest.
My favorite; “The kharmic retribution for putting good men into the "Friend Zone" while getting hurt by bad boys is to become bitter, angry, and the owner of at least three cats.”
Well guys, I can't really take credit for the post but I'm happy it has affected you enough to make you respond to it. Believe me, I'm as unhappy as anyone about how far society has allowed the rot to spread.
Here are the rules quoted for posterity... credit goes to the original anonymous poster.
Rules for Single Women.
- If you think all men are pigs, expect to live alone when you get older.
- If you have 100 reasons to reject a man, expect to live alone when you get older.
- Prince Charming is gay.
- Rich, attractive, nice - you can only have two in a man.
- If you ask a man on a first date how much he earns or what kind of car he drives, he gets to look at your bare breasts while you are still in the restaurant.
- If you answer your cell phone during a first date, he has the right to immediately get up and leave with no explanation.
- Choosey and "stuck up" are closely related.
- At 40, single "Rules Girls" become single, lonely women.
- If you expect a man to pay for everything, you'll need a strong jaw and a good tongue.
- Perfect men don't exist. Good men are everywhere.
- It's OK not to want kids. It's not OK to sacrifice your personal life and goals for your career.
- The kharmic retribution for putting good men into the "Friend Zone" while getting hurt by bad boys is to become bitter, angry, and the owner of at least three cats.
- You are not a princess no matter what your T-Shirt states. If you really think you are a princess, then you'd better have the body of a stripper, the face of an angel, and the personality of a saint. Even so, only Prince Charming can marry a princess and Prince Charming is gay.
- Your single girlfriends don't want you to have a happy relationship with a man. Consider this when listening to their advice.
- A man won't say "I love you" until he is 100% confident that you won't use this against him. This might take years, be patient because men can be sensitive, too.
- Taking the time to look your best is not optional. After all, if you can catch his eye then you can catch his heart. Being agreeable, pleasant, and happy will seal the deal.
- Smiles and laughter are contagious and can melt any man's heart.
- The unintended consequence of independence is loneliness.
- There is a fine line between expecting that a man pay for everything and being a common prostitute.
- Excessive complaining is neither attractive nor polite.
- You are entitled to nothing. However, you can expect rewards for working hard for something.
- Before you say "it's all his fault" after a bad date, look closely in the mirror.
- It's not always men making you unhappy. Don't let bitter women convince you of that.
- Being strong doesn't mean being bitchy. Southern women have known this for generations.
- You can't have it all. Please have the good sense to realize this.
- Compromise is not surrender, it's what is necessary to have a good relationship.
- Don't expect men to fall all over you just because you are a woman. Feminism taught men to be independent, too.
- There's nothing wrong with looking feminine.
- If he doesn't call you back, it means he's just not really into you. Deal with it.
- If you meet a man, don't find reasons to reject him or things to change in him. Find reasons to accept him and respect him.
- "As if" and "whatever" are immature insults used by 12 year olds, not intelligent young women.
- The common word in "drink whore" and "dinner whore" is still whore.
- Sorry girl, it's NOT all about you so you can change your T-Shirt now.
- Many men would rather chase women, not girls.
- Given the current state of divorce laws, don't expect any man to marry you. It's not you, it's just how things are right now.
- Hanging around gay men won't give you any useful insights about straight men. Frankly, hanging around gay men is just creepy.
- "No fat chicks" is the man's version of "If you're rich, I'm single".
- Winning a man is easy, keeping a man requires hard work.
- Advertising "Bitch" on your T-Shirt or sweatpants won't get you any dates. Single men don't care for that attitude.
- Deferring self-gratification is a sign of maturity. You can wait until dinner even if you're hungry now.
- The real world is pushy, rude, and often unpleasant. That doesn't mean you have to be the same way.
- If you dress like a tart, expect to be treated like a tart.
Thursday, November 02, 2006
I was bored and started clicking the button, and came across this gem. My life in Atlanta: Good to be home
I'll quote the relevant part so you don't have to go through the inane rantings of some self-absorbed woman, but the gist is that she's a Singaporean living in the US, and she is almost totally westernized by the looks of it. Remember guys, foreign women are not different from American women - once they're brought here, they get the same poisoning and turn into the same bitches that American women do.
I picked up the latest copy of The Sunday Times and found it amusing that ST seems to run the same old stories over and over again. The headlines screamed "Why foreign brides are HOT while local brides are NOT". Hello? Didn't ST cover this story many years back? Why are we revisiting this issue AGAIN? Singaporean men who marry foreign brides should know by now that they can't keep up with intelligent Singaporean girls and should just shut up and go back to their quiet, submissive foreign brides.
Well hello there, I bet you'd make a great feminist, and probably self-identify as one too, but of course you're "not one of those feminists" if asked.
In the comments section:
Anonymous said... dear carrie,
there's always 2 sides to the coin when it comes to an argument, in this case the foreign brides issue.
maybe we singaporean men have found that local woman are getting simply too demanding and obnoxious?
J? I've nothing against anybody nor am I ignoring the flip side of the coin, just peeved with ST's angle to the the story and the headlines. ST seems to imply that local men prefer wives from overseas because there's something fundamentally wrong with local women. Perhaps, next time, should they like to run the same, old story again, they should use a different headline, one that does not incriminate local girls for the lack of attractiveness of local men who can't measure up to them.
The more things change, the more they remain the same. Change singaporean girl to american girl or british girl or australian girl, and you've summed up the same argument that gets repeated in countless forums, blogs and newspapers - that the men are stupid and dumb and abusive, and foreign women are submissive, which a Real Man™ would never want, as this strong and independent woman knows that a domineering local woman is the best!
World Sex Survey Reveals Surprises
Here's a quote:
Multiple sexual partners, it turns out, are more common in industrialized than in developing nations.
So why is sexual health such a huge problem? The study suggests that unequal treatment of girls and women as the major sexual-health issue.
Is there anything that can't be blamed on society and men? These poor oppressed women are PERSECUTED into giving up their virginity (not like she could actually want sex!) in the back of the handsome jock's car, don't ya know? That's after he tortured them with a movie and/or a dinner where he cruelly opened his wallet as far as it would go, THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!
We should castrate all our boys so that this inequality can be rectified.
"The data make a powerful case for an intervention focus on the broader determinants of sexual health, such as poverty and mobility, but especially gender inequality."
These people see gender inequality in everything, and isn't it funny how the playing field is always uneven for women, never for men?
Marriage is no safeguard of sexual health. It is more difficult for married women to negotiate safe sex and condom use than it is for single women. Among girls who marry at a very young age, "very early sexual experience within marriage can be coercive and traumatic."
All sex is rape, so it figures that sex within marriage is also rape. And its the first rape, so it has to special - specially coercive and traumatic. I wonder how these people look at their naked bodies in the bathroom everyday. Oh wait, they may be pedophiles like Germaine Greer!
"Sexuality is an essential part of human nature and its expression needs to be affirmed rather than denied if public-health messages are to be heeded," Wellings and colleagues argue.
They actually mean female sexuality, a simple slip of the tongue there. Male sexuality is violent and to be kept in check. Coercive and traumatic sexual experiences are caused when the pustulent male comes in contact with the pure and virginal female. Kind of like how members of the Women's KKK whipped up the men around them into a fury by complaining that a nigger had looked at them the wrong way.
Wednesday, November 01, 2006
The study showed girls who turned 15 between 1995 and 1999 were more likely to have had sex than those who turned 15 between 1975 and 1979.
The study revealed boys who turned 15 between 1995 and 1999 were less likely to lose their virginity earlier than those who turned 15 between 1975 and 1979.
So it turns out that not only are women becoming sluttier with each generation, they are far ahead of men. Equal opportunity case, anyone? :-D
Frankly, I'm not surprised. We do know that Australia and the UK are two of the most feminized countries in the world (as opposed to socialized, which Scandinavian Europe takes the cake for) although the US is not far behind. So it stands to reason that as boys are told to be ashamed of their sexuality while we celebrate all instances of female sexuality, it is clear that women will start having sex earlier, with all the social ills that brings along, teenage pregnancy being only one of them. Of course the balm used to heal those ills will be made out of men's sweat and blood in the form of taxes.
Boys and girls who have sex before 15 account for less than 10 per cent of the population.They are obviously trying to minimize the impact of the study by implying that these whores make up only a small segment of the total population. In typical feminist fashion, this is irrelevant information - we don't care about the percentage of sluts in the total population, tell us the pertinent information - Boys and girls who have sex before 15 account for [X]% of the total adolescent population.
Another interesting bit was about the average age of sex - in countries without feminist influence and with a strong marriage culture, the ages are different - men select younger, more fecund wives who have presumably not had more cocks than a chicken farm. I hope nobody compares Nigeria's 15.5 to Australia's 17.5 - look up the life expectancy of the average Nigerian and the average Australian.
The global study found the average age Australians lost virginity was 17.5 years for both sexes.
In Nigeria it's 15.5 years for women and 20.5 years for men, and in Indonesia, 18.5 years for women and 24.5 years for men.
All very interesting stuff, and I'm sure the situation in the rest of the feminized countries will be much the same. Look for this and all future studies not exploring the "girls are angels and princesses" party-approved subject to be quashed.
I know there will be people who will think, "So what's the problem? The boys in school are getting hot pieces of underage ass, I fully approve of this!" but I'm going to take the high road and say that it is not good for society to have women who are such sluts.